IETF Discussion

• Thread Index

• RE: [Ietf-http-auth] Re: Next step on web phishing draft(draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt)
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: joining the IETF is luxury Re: 70th IETF - Registration
  • From: Glen Zorn
• Re: [tsv-dir] Re: Transport Directorate review of draft-ietf-ipfix-implementation-guidelines-06.txt
  • From: Simon Leinen
• Re: [Ietf-http-auth] Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt)
  • From: Alexey Melnikov
• Re: [Ietf-http-auth] Re: Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt)
  • From: Alexey Melnikov
• Re: Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt)
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: [Ietf-http-auth] Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt)
  • From: Bernard Aboba
• RE: Next step on web phishing draft(draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt)
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt)
  • From: Bill Manning
• Re: Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt)
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Re: Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt)
  • From: Marshall Eubanks
• Re: Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt)
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Re: [Ietf-http-auth] Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt)
  • From: Alexey Melnikov
• Re: [saag] [Ietf-http-auth] Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt)
  • From: Bernard Aboba
• Re: [Ietf-http-auth] Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt)
  • From: Eric Rescorla
• Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt)
  • From: Alexey Melnikov
• RE: joining the IETF is luxury Re: 70th IETF - Registration
  • From: Darryl (Dassa) Lynch
• Re: joining the IETF is luxury Re: 70th IETF - Registration
  • From: Bob Braden
• Re: joining the IETF is luxury Re: 70th IETF - Registration
  • From: Marshall Eubanks
• Re: joining the IETF is luxury Re: 70th IETF - Registration
  • From: Simon Josefsson
• Re: joining the IETF is luxury Re: 70th IETF - Registration
  • From: James Carlson
• Re: joining the IETF is luxury Re: 70th IETF - Registration
  • From: Andy Bierman
• Re: joining the IETF is luxury Re: 70th IETF - Registration
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: joining the IETF is luxury Re: 70th IETF - Registration
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• RE: joining the IETF is luxury Re: 70th IETF - Registration
  • From: Eric Gray (LO/EUS)
• Re: [tsv-dir] Re: Transport Directorate review of draft-ietf-ipfix-implementation-guidelines-06.txt
  • From: Elisa Boschi
• Re: [tsv-dir] Re: Transport Directorate review of draft-ietf-ipfix-implementation-guidelines-06.txt
  • From: Elisa Boschi
• RE: [tsv-dir] Re: Transport Directorate review of draft-ietf-ipfix-implementation-guidelines-06.txt
  • From: Black_David
• Re: joining the IETF is luxury Re: 70th IETF - Registration
  • From: Lars Eggert
• joining the IETF is luxury Re: 70th IETF - Registration
  • From: YAO
• ISOC Fellowship to the IETF - seeking applicants for IETF 70 and IETF 71
  • From: Mirjam Kuehne
• Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
  • From: Thomas Narten
• Re: Last Call: draft-saintandre-jabberid (The Jabber-ID Header Field) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Tony Finch
• Re: Last Call: draft-saintandre-jabberid (The Jabber-ID Header Field) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Peter Saint-Andre
• Re: Last Call: draft-saintandre-jabberid (The Jabber-ID Header Field) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Tony Finch
• Re: Last Call: draft-saintandre-jabberid (The Jabber-ID Header Field) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Last Call: draft-saintandre-jabberid (The Jabber-ID Header Field) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Peter Saint-Andre
• RE: Transport Directorate review of draft-ietf-ipfix-implementation-guidelines-06.txt
  • From: Black_David
• Re: [tsv-dir] Re: Transport Directorate review of draft-ietf-ipfix-implementation-guidelines-06.txt
  • From: Paul Aitken
• Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-magma-mgmd-mib(MulticastGroup Membership Discovery MIB) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Julian Chesterfield
• Re: [tsv-dir] Re: Transport Directorate review of draft-ietf-ipfix-implementation-guidelines-06.txt
  • From: Lars Eggert
• Re: [tsv-dir] Re: Transport Directorate review of draft-ietf-ipfix-implementation-guidelines-06.txt
  • From: Paul Aitken
• Re: Transport Directorate review of draft-ietf-ipfix-implementation-guidelines-06.txt
  • From: Elisa Boschi
• Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-magma-mgmd-mib(MulticastGroup Membership Discovery MIB) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Julian Chesterfield
• Re: (no subject)
  • From: Dave Aronson
• Re: [tsv-dir] Re: Transport Directorate review of draft-ietf-ipfix-implementation-guidelines-06.txt
  • From: Lars Eggert
• (no subject)
  • From: rawad Melhem
• Re: Last Call: draft-saintandre-jabberid (The Jabber-ID Header Field) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Last Call: draft-saintandre-jabberid (The Jabber-ID Header Field) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Peter Saint-Andre
• Re: Last Call: draft-saintandre-jabberid (The Jabber-ID Header Field) to Proposed Standard
  • From: SM
• RE: Behind the NAT registration
  • From: Dan Wing
• Re: RFC 1345 mnemonics table not consistent with Unicode 3.2.0
  • From: Randy Presuhn
• Vancouver meeting fees
  • From: Kurt Erik Lindqvist
• RE: Last Call: draft-ietf-magma-mgmd-mib(MulticastGroup Membership Discovery MIB) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
• Re: What to do next?
  • From: Stefanos Harhalakis
• Re: What to do next?
  • From: Spencer Dawkins
• RE: Last Call: draft-ietf-magma-mgmd-mib(MulticastGroup Membership Discovery MIB) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
• Re: What to do next?
  • From: Stefanos Harhalakis
• Re: What to do next?
  • From: xupeili 18916
• Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-magma-mgmd-mib (Multicast Group Membership Discovery MIB) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Stig Venaas
• What to do next?
  • From: Stefanos Harhalakis
• Re: IETF standard vs. W3C recommendations
  • From: Peili Xu
• Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Re: RFC 1345 mnemonics table not consistent with Unicode 3.2.0
  • From: Doug Ewell
• Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Keith Moore
• RE: [address-policy-wg] Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: michael.dillon
• Re: RFC 1345 mnemonics table not consistent with Unicode 3.2.0
  • From: Simon Josefsson
• Behind the NAT registration
  • From: Dangi
• Re: RFC 1345 mnemonics table not consistent with Unicode 3.2.0
  • From: Jaap Akkerhuis
• RFC 1345 as an input method
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: RFC 1345 mnemonics table not consistent with Unicode 3.2.0
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: RFC 1345 mnemonics table not consistent with Unicode 3.2.0
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: RFC 1345 mnemonics table not consistent with Unicode 3.2.0
  • From: Keith Moore
• Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
  • From: Thomas Narten
• Re: RFC 1345 mnemonics table not consistent with Unicode 3.2.0
  • From: Randy Presuhn
• Re: RFC 1345 mnemonics table not consistent with Unicode 3.2.0
  • From: Ned Freed
• Re: History of autoconfig RFCs and siblings, please?
  • From: Stig Venaas
• Re: History of autoconfig RFCs and siblings, please?
  • From: Mark Andrews
• Re: RFC 1345 mnemonics table not consistent with Unicode 3.2.0
  • From: Ben Finney
• Re: RFC 1345 mnemonics table not consistent with Unicode 3.2.0
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: RFC 1345 mnemonics table not consistent with Unicode 3.2.0
  • From: Ned Freed
• Re: History of autoconfig RFCs and siblings, please?
  • From: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
• Re: RFC 1345 mnemonics table not consistent with Unicode 3.2.0
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: RFC 1345 mnemonics table not consistent with Unicode 3.2.0
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: RFC 1345 mnemonics table not consistent with Unicode 3.2.0
  • From: Lisa Dusseault
• Re: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all]
  • From: David Schutt
• Re: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all]
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all]
  • From: Keith Moore
• RE: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all]
  • From: michael.dillon
• RE: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all]
  • From: michael.dillon
• Re: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all]
  • From: Jeroen Massar
• Re: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all]
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all]
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Re: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all]
  • From: Thomas Narten
• Re: Joining IETF
  • From: Marshall Eubanks
• Joining IETF
  • From: Benson III, John Madison
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Thomas Narten
• RE: Last Call comment on draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-iana-00.txt
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Tony Finch
• Re: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all]
  • From: Bill Manning
• Re: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all]
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all]
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all]
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all]
  • From: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
• Re: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all]
  • From: Bill Manning
• Re: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all]
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all]
  • From: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
• Re: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all]
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Last Call comment on draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-iana-00.txt
  • From: David Conrad
• Re: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all]
  • From: Edward Lewis
• Re: Last Call comment on draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-iana-00.txt
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Last Call comment on draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-iana-00.txt
  • From: Mark Andrews
• Re: Last Call comment on draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-iana-00.txt
  • From: David Conrad
• Re: Last Call comment on draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-iana-00.txt
  • From: Mark Andrews
• Re: Last Call comment on draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-iana-00.txt
  • From: David Conrad
• Re: Last Call comment on draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-iana-00.txt
  • From: Mark Andrews
• Re: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all]
  • From: David Conrad
• Re: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all]
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Re: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all]
  • From: Edward Lewis
• Re: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all]
  • From: Bill Manning
• RE: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all]
  • From: michael.dillon
• Re: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all]
  • From: Bill Manning
• Re: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all]
  • From: Keith Moore
• RE: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all]
  • From: Ray Plzak
• Re: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all]
  • From: Keith Moore
• RE: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce afterall]
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce afterall]
  • From: Bound, Jim
• RE: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all]
  • From: Ray Plzak
• Re: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all]
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all]
  • From: Bob Braden
• Re: Last Call comment on draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-iana-00.txt
  • From: Ted Hardie
• IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all]
  • From: Thomas Narten
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Roger Jørgensen
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Keith Moore
• RE: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: FW: [Inquiry #96698] Help!
  • From: Hex Star
• Re: Last Call comment on draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-iana-00.txt
  • From: Mark Andrews
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Joel Jaeggli
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: David Kessens
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Thomas Narten
• Re: Business case for IPv6 (Was: Re: one example of an unintendedconsequence of changing the /48 boundary)
  • From: Marc Manthey
• RE: Business case for IPv6 (Was: Re: one example of an unintendedconsequence of changing the /48 boundary)
  • From: Fleischman, Eric
• Business case for IPv6 (Was: Re: one example of an unintended consequence of changing the /48 boundary)
  • From: Greg Skinner
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Joel Jaeggli
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: David Kessens
• RE: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: michael.dillon
• RE: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: michael.dillon
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Thomas Narten
• IETF standard vs. W3C recommendations
  • From: Carlos Narváez
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Thomas Narten
• RE: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Russ Housley
• Vancouver IETF Code Sprint
  • From: IETF Chair
• Re: Transport Directorate review of draft-ietf-ipfix-implementation-guidelines-06.txt
  • From: Elisa Boschi
• RE: [ppml] IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Davis, Terry L
• Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-enum-calendar-service-03.txt
  • From: Black_David
• Re: [ppml] IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Tommy Perniciaro
• FW: [Inquiry #96698] Help!
  • From: Herb Overstreet
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: RJ Atkinson
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: RJ Atkinson
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: RJ Atkinson
• Re: Last Call comment on draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-iana-00.txt
  • From: Edward Lewis
• Re: [ppml] IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• RE: one example of an unintended consequence of changing the /48boundary
  • From: michael.dillon
• RE: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: michael.dillon
• RE: one example of an unintended consequence of changing the/48boundary
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: ION Announcement: DISCUSS Criteria in IESG Review
  • From: Russ Housley
• Features vs benefits
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: ION Announcement: DISCUSS Criteria in IESG Review
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: ION Announcement: DISCUSS Criteria in IESG Review
  • From: Spencer Dawkins
• Re: ION Announcement: DISCUSS Criteria in IESG Review
  • From: Spencer Dawkins
• Last Call comment on draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-iana-00.txt
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: ION Announcement: DISCUSS Criteria in IESG Review
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: ION Announcement: DISCUSS Criteria in IESG Review
  • From: Russ Housley
• RE: one example of an unintended consequence of changing the /48boundary
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• RE: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• Re: ION Announcement: DISCUSS Criteria in IESG Review
  • From: Spencer Dawkins
• Re: When will ISP's switch over to IPv6 and how will it affect customers?
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Arnt Gulbrandsen
• RE: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Peter Dambier
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Arnt Gulbrandsen
• Re: When will ISP's switch over to IPv6 and how will it affect customers?
  • From: Keith Moore
• When will ISP's switch over to IPv6 and how will it affect customers?
  • From: Hex Star
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Keith Moore
• RE: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Keith Moore
• RE: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Christian Huitema
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Arnt Gulbrandsen
• RE: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: John C Klensin
• RE: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: michael.dillon
• RE: one example of an unintended consequence of changing the /48boundary
  • From: michael.dillon
• RE: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: michael.dillon
• RE: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: michael.dillon
• Re: RFC 1345 mnemonics table not consistent with Unicode 3.2.0
  • From: Ben Finney
• Re: RFC 1345 mnemonics table not consistent with Unicode 3.2.0
  • From: Doug Ewell
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: John C Klensin
• RE: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Christian Huitema
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Re: RFC 1345 mnemonics table not consistent with Unicode 3.2.0
  • From: Ben Finney
• Re: RFC 1345 mnemonics table not consistent with Unicode 3.2.0
  • From: Randy Presuhn
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: RFC 1345 mnemonics table not consistent with Unicode 3.2.0
  • From: Ben Finney
• Re: RFC 1345 mnemonics table not consistent with Unicode 3.2.0
  • From: Randy Presuhn
• Re: Last Call: draft-saintandre-jabberid (The Jabber-ID Header Field) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Cullen Jennings
• Re: RFC 1345 mnemonics table not consistent with Unicode 3.2.0
  • From: Ben Finney
• Re: one example of an unintended consequence of changing the /48 boundary
  • From: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Bob Hinden
• Re: one example of an unintended consequence of changing the /48 boundary
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: one example of an unintended consequence of changing the /48 boundary
  • From: Thomas Narten
• one example of an unintended consequence of changing the /48 boundary
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Lyndon Nerenberg
• Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Roger Jørgensen
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Tony Li
• Re: Last Call: draft-saintandre-jabberid (The Jabber-ID Header Field) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Cullen Jennings
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Thomas Narten
• Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
• Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
• Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Last Call: draft-saintandre-jabberid (The Jabber-ID Header Field) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Alexey Melnikov
• Re: Last Call: draft-saintandre-jabberid (The Jabber-ID Header Field) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Peter Saint-Andre
• Re: Last Call: draft-saintandre-jabberid (The Jabber-ID Header Field) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Peter Saint-Andre
• Re: Last Call: draft-saintandre-jabberid (The Jabber-ID Header Field) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Alexey Melnikov
• Re: Last Call: draft-saintandre-jabberid (The Jabber-ID Header Field) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Cullen Jennings
• Re: Last Call: draft-saintandre-jabberid (The Jabber-ID Header Field) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Cullen Jennings
• Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Terry Gray
• Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: David Conrad
• Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Re: Last Call: draft-saintandre-jabberid (The Jabber-ID Header Field) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Peter Saint-Andre
• Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Roger Jørgensen
• Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarceafter all
  • From: Spencer Dawkins
• Re: DNS as 1980s technology [was Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all]
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: David Conrad
• Re: DNS as 1980s technology [was Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all]
  • From: Roger Jørgensen
• RE: DNS as 1980s technology [was Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all]
  • From: michael.dillon
• Re: Last Call: draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-iana (DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV) IANA Registry) to Informational RFC
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Re: Last Call: draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-iana (DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV) IANA Registry) to Informational RFC
  • From: Edward Lewis
• Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: David Conrad
• Re: DNS as 1980s technology [was Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all]
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: DNS as 1980s technology [was Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all]
  • From: Jeroen Massar
• Re: DNS as 1980s technology [was Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all]
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Last Call: draft-saintandre-jabberid (The Jabber-ID Header Field) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Eric Allman
• Re: Last Call: draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-iana (DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV) IANA Registry) to Informational RFC
  • From: Thomas Narten
• Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• DNS as 1980s technology [was Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all]
  • From: Thomas Narten
• RE: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Dave Cridland
• Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Last Call: draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-iana (DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV) IANA Registry) to Informational RFC
  • From: David Conrad
• Re: Last Call: draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-iana (DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV) IANA Registry) to Informational RFC
  • From: Mark Andrews
• Re: Last Call: draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-iana (DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV) IANA Registry) to Informational RFC
  • From: David Kessens
• Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
  • From: Thomas Narten
• Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
• Re: RFC 1345 mnemonics table not consistent with Unicode 3.2.0
  • From: Randy Presuhn
• Re: Last Call: draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-iana (DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV) IANA Registry) to Informational RFC
  • From: Geoff Huston
• Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Last Call: draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-iana (DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV) IANA Registry) to Informational RFC
  • From: Mark Andrews
• Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: David Conrad
• Re: Last Call: draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-iana (DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV) IANA Registry) to Informational RFC
  • From: Geoff Huston
• RFC 1345 mnemonics table not consistent with Unicode 3.2.0
  • From: Ben Finney
• Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Dave Cridland
• RE: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Stephen Kent
• Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Larson, Matt
• Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Sam Hartman
• IETF 71: Social Venue Survey
  • From: Livingood, Jason
• Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Keith Moore
• RE: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: e2e
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: Review of draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05
  • From: Eric Rescorla
• Re: e2e
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Re: e2e
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Review of draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05
  • From: Christian Vogt
• Meeting the "requirements" of a BCP
  • From: Lakshminath Dondeti
• Re: Review of draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05
  • From: Paul Hoffman
• RE: e2e
  • From: michael.dillon
• Re: Review of draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: e2e
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: e2e
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Re: Review of draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05
  • From: Stephen Kent
• requirement documents
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: e2e
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: e2e
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: e2e
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Review of draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: Review of draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05
  • From: John C Klensin
• Review of draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05
  • From: Christian Vogt
• Re: e2e
  • From: Tony Finch
• Re: Review of draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: Review of draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Review of draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05
  • From: Hannes Tschofenig
• Re: Review of draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05
  • From: Henning Schulzrinne
• Re: Review of draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: e2e
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Roger Jørgensen
• Re: New models for email (Re: e2e)
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: New models for email (Re: e2e)
  • From: SM
• Re: New models for email (Re: e2e)
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Review of draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Review of draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05
  • From: Paul Hoffman
• Re: e2e
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
• Re: e2e
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: New models for email (Re: e2e)
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: Review of draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05
  • From: Eric Rescorla
• Re: Review of draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: e2e
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: New models for email (Re: e2e)
  • From: Tony Finch
• Re: New models for email (Re: e2e)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: New models for email (Re: e2e)
  • From: Tony Finch
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Mark Andrews
• Re: e2e
  • From: Tony Finch
• Re: Review of draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05
  • From: Paul Hoffman
• Re: Review of draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05
  • From: Eric Rescorla
• Re: e2e
  • From: Tony Finch
• Re: Review of draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Keith Moore
• The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Review of draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05
  • From: Eric Rescorla
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Suresh Krishnan
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Keith Moore
• RE: New models for email (Re: e2e)
  • From: michael.dillon
• Re: Informational vs. Informational
  • From: Sam Hartman
• RE: e2e
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: New models for email (Re: e2e)
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
• RE: New models for email (Re: e2e)
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt
  • From: Rémi Denis-Courmont
• Re: New models for email (Re: e2e)
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Informational vs. Informational
  • From: Eric Rescorla
• Re: e2e
  • From: John Day
• Re: New models for email (Re: e2e)
  • From: Steven M. Bellovin
• Re: e2e
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: e2e
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: e2e
  • From: Fred Baker
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt
  • From: Mark Andrews
• Is there a need for a standard general XML format for describing computer files?
  • From: Trace Bond
• Re: New models for email (Re: e2e)
  • From: Dave Crocker
• RE: New models for email (Re: e2e)
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: New models for email (Re: e2e)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: New models for email (Re: e2e)
  • From: Michael Thomas
• RE: e2e
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: New models for email (Re: e2e)
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Does anybody know where Jim Bell is - is he out of jail?
  • From: Joe Baptista
• Re: the curse of the S(imple) protocols, was: Re: e2e
  • From: SM
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt
  • From: Arnt Gulbrandsen
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Re: Informational vs. Informational
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
• Re: Informational vs. Informational
  • From: Andy Bierman
• Informational vs. Informational
  • From: Paul Hoffman
• Re: Review of draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Secretariat Services Bidder Comments Sought
  • From: Ray Pelletier
• Re: the curse of the S(imple) protocols, was: Re: e2e
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: the curse of the S(imple) protocols, was: Re: e2e
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: RJ Atkinson
• Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-avt-rtp-and-rtcp-mux-07.txt
  • From: Black_David
• Re: Gen-art review of draft-ietf-ccamp-inter-domain-pd-path-comp-05.txt
  • From: JP Vasseur
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Roger Jørgensen
• RE: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: michael.dillon
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Roger Jørgensen
• Re: Last Call: draft-duerst-archived-at (The Archived-At Message Header Field) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Martin Duerst
• RE: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• RE: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: michael.dillon
• RE: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: michael.dillon
• RE: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: michael.dillon
• Re: the curse of the S(imple) protocols, was: Re: e2e
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Jeroen Massar
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: David Morris
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Tony Li
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Tony Li
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Tony Li
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all - /64 FIB burden oops...
  • From: Robin Whittle
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Hex Star
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Jeroen Massar
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Tony Li
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Tony Li
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Mark Andrews
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: David Morris
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Terry Gray
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: the curse of the S(imple) protocols, was: Re: e2e
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity
  • From: Arnt Gulbrandsen
• Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity
  • From: Arnt Gulbrandsen
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: David Conrad
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Steven M. Bellovin
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Review of draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05
  • From: Eric Rescorla
• Re: Review of draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all - /64 FIB burden
  • From: Robin Whittle
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Tony Li
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Steven M. Bellovin
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Tony Li
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Joel Jaeggli
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
• Re: e2e
  • From: SM
• Re: the curse of the S(imple) protocols, was: Re: e2e
  • From: SM
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Joel Jaeggli
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Bill Manning
• RE: Gen-art review of draft-ietf-ccamp-inter-domain-pd-path-comp-05.txt
  • From: BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A, ATTLABS
• RE: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: michael.dillon
• Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: Keith Moore
• IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  • From: michael.dillon
• Re: the curse of the S(imple) protocols, was: Re: e2e
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: the curse of the S(imple) protocols, was: Re: e2e
  • From: John Levine
• Re: the curse of the S(imple) protocols, was: Re: e2e
  • From: Steven M. Bellovin
• Re: the curse of the S(imple) protocols, was: Re: e2e
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Review of draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05
  • From: Eric Rescorla
• Re: New models for email (Re: e2e)
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: the curse of the S(imple) protocols, was: Re: e2e
  • From: Henning Schulzrinne
• Gen-art review of draft-ietf-ccamp-inter-domain-pd-path-comp-05.txt
  • From: Elwyn Davies
• Re: the curse of the S(imple) protocols, was: Re: e2e
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: the curse of the S(imple) protocols, was: Re: e2e
  • From: Steven M. Bellovin
• Re: the curse of the S(imple) protocols, was: Re: e2e
  • From: John C Klensin
• the curse of the S(imple) protocols, was: Re: e2e
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
• New models for email (Re: e2e)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: e2e
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: e2e
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Re: e2e
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
  • From: Thomas Narten
• RE: e2e
  • From: SM
• Re: e2e
  • From: Keith Moore
• RE: e2e
  • From: michael.dillon
• RE: e2e
  • From: michael.dillon
• Re: e2e
  • From: Douglas Otis
• RE: e2e
  • From: SM
• Re: e2e
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: e2e
  • From: Tony Finch
• Re: e2e
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: e2e
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: e2e
  • From: Gunnar Lindberg
• RE: e2e
  • From: michael.dillon
• Re: e2e
  • From: Greg Skinner
• Re: e2e
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: e2e
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Re: e2e
  • From: Tony Finch
• Re: e2e
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: e2e
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: e2e
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: e2e
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: e2e
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: e2e
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: e2e
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: e2e
  • From: Fred Baker
• Re: e2e
  • From: Lakshminath Dondeti
• Re: e2e
  • From: Fred Baker
• Gen-art review of draft-ietf-ipfix-implementation-guidelines-06.txt
  • From: Elwyn Davies
• Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-mboned-ip-mcast-mib (IP Multicast MIB) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Stig Venaas
• RE: [manet] Last Call: draft-ietf-manet-iana (Internet AssignedNumbers Authority (IANA) Allocations for the Mobile Ad hocNetworks (MANET) Working Group) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• Re: [manet] Last Call: draft-ietf-manet-iana (Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Allocations for the Mobile Ad hoc Networks (MANET) Working Group) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Bo Berry
• Re: Transport Directorate review of draft-ietf-ipfix-implementation-guidelines-06.txt
  • From: Elisa Boschi
• Re: [manet] Last Call: draft-ietf-manet-iana (Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Allocations for the Mobile Ad hoc Networks (MANET) Working Group) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Bo Berry
• Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-sip-ice-option-tag-02
  • From: Black_David
• RE: [manet] Last Call: draft-ietf-manet-iana (Internet AssignedNumbers Authority (IANA) Allocations for the Mobile Ad hocNetworks (MANET) Working Group) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Teco Boot
• Re: [manet] Last Call: draft-ietf-manet-iana (Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Allocations for the Mobile Ad hoc Networks (MANET) Working Group) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Ian Chakeres
• RE: Transport Directorate review of draft-ietf-ipfix-implementation-guidelines-06.txt
  • From: Black_David
• Re: [manet] Last Call: draft-ietf-manet-iana (Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Allocations for the Mobile Ad hoc Networks (MANET) Working Group) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Ian Chakeres
• Re: [manet] Last Call: draft-ietf-manet-iana (Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Allocations for the Mobile Ad hoc Networks (MANET) Working Group) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Bo Berry
• Re: [manet] Last Call: draft-ietf-manet-iana (Internet AssignedNumbers Authority (IANA) Allocations for the Mobile Ad hocNetworks (MANET) Working Group) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Ian Chakeres
• To post to this list
  • From: Prashant Manandhar
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt
  • From: Peter Dambier
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt
  • From: Geoff Huston
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt
  • From: Keith Moore
• RE: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt
  • From: michael.dillon
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt
  • From: Keith Moore
• RE: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt
  • From: michael.dillon
• Re: IPv4
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• RE: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt
  • From: Michel Py
• Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
  • From: Thomas Narten
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt
  • From: Mark Andrews
• Re: IPv4
  • From: David Kessens
• Re: IPv4
  • From: Bill Manning
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: IPv4
  • From: Stephen Kent
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: draft-shirey-secgloss-v2-08.txt
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt
  • From: Arnt Gulbrandsen
• Re: IPv4
  • From: Bill Manning
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: IPv4
  • From: Stephen Kent
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt
  • From: Marshall Eubanks
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt
  • From: David Conrad
• RE: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt
  • From: Eastlake III Donald-LDE008
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt
  • From: Marshall Eubanks
• Re: IPv4
  • From: Bill Manning
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt
  • From: Daniel Senie
• Re: IPv4
  • From: Stephen Kent
• Re: draft-shirey-secgloss-v2-08.txt
  • From: Stephen Kent
• Re: IPv4
  • From: Bill Manning
• draft-shirey-secgloss-v2-08.txt
  • From: David Harrington
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt
  • From: Marshall Eubanks
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt
  • From: Geoff Huston
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt
  • From: Ned Freed
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt
  • From: Douglas Otis
• RE: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt
  • From: Ned Freed
• Re: IPv4
  • From: Stephen Kent
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt
  • From: David Conrad
• RE: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt
  • From: william(at)elan.net
• RE: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt
  • From: Paul Hoffman
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt
  • From: Paul Hoffman
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt
  • From: Marshall Eubanks
• Question on Half-Open Connection Discovery - RFC 793
  • From: Nam_Nguyen
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt
  • From: Douglas Otis
• RE: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: IPv4
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: IPv4
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt
  • From: Arnt Gulbrandsen
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: IPv4
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt
  • From: Arnt Gulbrandsen
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt
  • From: Rémi Denis-Courmont
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• RE: Last Call: draft-hunt-avt-rtcpxnq (BT's eXtended Network Quality RTP Control Protocol Extended Reports (RTCP XR XNQ)) to Informational RFC
  • From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
• Re: what's up with the management
  • From: Geoff Huston
• RE: IPv4
  • From: michael.dillon
• Re: what's up with the management
  • From: IETF member Dave Aronson
• Re: selling IPv4 addresses vs. the POTS number model
  • From: Roger Jørgensen
• Re: selling IPv4 addresses vs. the POTS number model
  • From: Arnt Gulbrandsen
• Re: what's up with the management
  • From: Joe Abley
• Re: what's up with the management
  • From: Simon Josefsson
• Re: what's up with the management
  • From: Joe Abley
• Re: selling IPv4 addresses vs. the POTS number model
  • From: Arnt Gulbrandsen
• Re: Ream-Specific IP (Was: IPv4)
  • From: Eric Burger
• Ream-Specific IP (Was: IPv4)
  • From: Julien Laganier
• RE: selling IPv4 addresses vs. the POTS number model
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-sip-answermode-04.txt
  • From: Suresh Krishnan
• Re: selling IPv4 addresses
  • From: John L
• Re: selling IPv4 addresses vs. the POTS number model
  • From: David Morris
• Re: selling IPv4 addresses
  • From: Clint Chaplin
• Re: selling IPv4 addresses
  • From: John Levine
• Re: IPv4
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: IPv4
  • From: Clint Chaplin
• Re: IPv4
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
• RE: IPv4
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: on the value of "running code" (was Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?)
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: on the value of "running code" (was Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?)
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: on the value of "running code" (was Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?)
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: on the value of "running code" (was Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?)
  • From: Tom.Petch
• Re: IPv4
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
• RE: Last Call: draft-drage-sipping-service-identification (A Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Extension for the Identification of Services) to Informational RFC
  • From: Atle Monrad (GR/ETO)
• RE: IPv4
  • From: michael.dillon
• A prediction (was Re: IPv4)
  • From: Arnt Gulbrandsen
• what's up with the management
  • From: Pekka Savola
• RE: IPv4
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: IPv4
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: IPv4
  • From: michael.dillon
• Re: IPv4
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: IPv4
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
• RE: IPv4
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
  • From: Thomas Narten
• Re: IPv4
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: IPv4
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: IPv4
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum