Re: Required doc sections (Re: [saag] Next step on web phishing draft(draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt))

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thomas Narten wrote:
>> Agreed. In my experience, the IANA does not want the I-D to contain a
>> section entitled "IANA Considerations" if there are no actions required
>> of the IANA.
> 
> Your experience does not match what IANA has stated numerous
> times. Please see section 6.1 of
> draft-narten-iana-considerations-rfc2434bis-07.txt, which contains
> text that IANA has a large part in crafting.

By "my experience" I mean for example RFC 3922; during Auth48 or
thereabouts I was told that the IANA didn't want the document to include
an "IANA Considerations" section since there were no actions required of
the IANA. But perhaps that was a miscommunication.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]