IETF Discussion

• Thread Index

• Re: draft-klensin-iaoc-member-01 (was: Re: I-D Action: draft-hardie-iaoc-iab-update-00.txt)
  • From: joel jaeggli
• Re: IETF Culture was: Re: draft-klensin-iaoc-member-01 (was: Re: I-D Action: draft-hardie-iaoc-iab-update-00.txt)
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey-07.txt>
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey-07.txt>
  • From: John R Levine
• Re: IETF Culture was: Re: draft-klensin-iaoc-member-01 (was: Re: I-D Action: draft-hardie-iaoc-iab-update-00.txt)
  • From: nalini.elkins
• IETF Culture was: Re: draft-klensin-iaoc-member-01 (was: Re: I-D Action: draft-hardie-iaoc-iab-update-00.txt)
  • From: Michael StJohns
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Mark Andrews
• Re: draft-klensin-iaoc-member-01 (was: Re: I-D Action: draft-hardie-iaoc-iab-update-00.txt)
  • From: Andrew Sullivan
• Re: draft-klensin-iaoc-member-01 (was: Re: I-D Action: draft-hardie-iaoc-iab-update-00.txt)
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: draft-klensin-iaoc-member-01 (was: Re: I-D Action: draft-hardie-iaoc-iab-update-00.txt)
  • From: Michael StJohns
• Re: ietf Digest, Vol 93, Issue 75
  • From: Zack Cylinder
• Re: ietf Digest, Vol 93, Issue 75
  • From: Zack Cylinder
• Huawei to Sponsor IETF Meeting Hackathons in 2016!
  • From: IETF Administrative Director
• Re: draft-klensin-iaoc-member-01 (was: Re: I-D Action: draft-hardie-iaoc-iab-update-00.txt)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: draft-klensin-iaoc-member-01 (was: Re: I-D Action: draft-hardie-iaoc-iab-update-00.txt)
  • From: Andrew Sullivan
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey-07.txt>
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcp-privacy-03
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: [dhcwg] Gen-Art review: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-privacy-04
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt-06
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-eppext-tmch-smd-04
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: draft-klensin-iaoc-member-01 (was: Re: I-D Action: draft-hardie-iaoc-iab-update-00.txt)
  • From: Michael StJohns
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey-07.txt>
  • From: Viktor Dukhovni
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey-07.txt>
  • From: Paul Wouters
• Re: draft-klensin-iaoc-member-01 (was: Re: I-D Action: draft-hardie-iaoc-iab-update-00.txt)
  • From: Andrew Sullivan
• Re: [dhcwg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dhc-anonymity-profile-06.txt> (Anonymity profile for DHCP clients) to Proposed Standard
  • From: 神明達哉
• Re: draft-klensin-iaoc-member-01 (was: Re: I-D Action: draft-hardie-iaoc-iab-update-00.txt)
  • From: Fred Baker (fred)
• Re: draft-klensin-iaoc-member-01 (was: Re: I-D Action: draft-hardie-iaoc-iab-update-00.txt)
  • From: Michael StJohns
• Re: draft-klensin-iaoc-member-01 (was: Re: I-D Action: draft-hardie-iaoc-iab-update-00.txt)
  • From: Michael StJohns
• Re: draft-klensin-iaoc-member-01 (was: Re: I-D Action: draft-hardie-iaoc-iab-update-00.txt)
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: [95attendees] [95all] IETF 95 - Local Letters of Invitation
  • From: Ray Pelletier
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey-07.txt>
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey-07.txt>
  • From: John Levine
• Re: [EMAIL FROM ZACK:] Re: ietf Digest, Vol 93, Issue 59
  • From: Huub van Helvoort
• Gen-Art review: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-privacy-04
  • From: Robert Sparks
• Re: [EMAIL FROM ZACK:] Re: ietf Digest, Vol 93, Issue 59
  • From: Huub van Helvoort
• RE: [dhcwg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dhc-anonymity-profile-06.txt> (Anonymity profile for DHCP clients) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Christian Huitema
• Re: draft-klensin-iaoc-member-01 (was: Re: I-D Action: draft-hardie-iaoc-iab-update-00.txt)
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: draft-klensin-iaoc-member-01 (was: Re: I-D Action: draft-hardie-iaoc-iab-update-00.txt)
  • From: Russ Housley
• [EMAIL FROM ZACK:] Re: ietf Digest, Vol 93, Issue 59
  • From: Zack Cylinder
• Re: draft-klensin-iaoc-member-01 (was: Re: I-D Action: draft-hardie-iaoc-iab-update-00.txt)
  • From: Michael StJohns
• RE: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-privacy-03
  • From: Bernie Volz (volz)
• Re: Gen-ART LC review: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-privacy-03
  • From: Tomek Mrugalski
• Re: Gen-ART LC review: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-privacy-03
  • From: Tomek Mrugalski
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-behave-ipfix-nat-logging-06.txt> (IPFIX Information Elements for logging NAT Events)
  • From: Senthil Sivakumar (ssenthil)
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-behave-ipfix-nat-logging-06.txt> (IPFIX Information Elements for logging NAT Events)
  • From: Senthil Sivakumar (ssenthil)
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-behave-ipfix-nat-logging-06.txt> (IPFIX Information Elements for logging NAT Events)
  • From: Paul Aitken
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-behave-ipfix-nat-logging-06.txt> (IPFIX Information Elements for logging NAT Events)
  • From: Paul Aitken
• Re: [dhcwg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dhc-anonymity-profile-06.txt> (Anonymity profile for DHCP clients) to Proposed Standard
  • From: 神明達哉
• RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcp-privacy-03
  • From: Sheng Jiang
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey-07.txt>
  • From: Paul Wouters
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey-07.txt>
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [dhcwg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dhc-anonymity-profile-06.txt> (Anonymity profile for DHCP clients) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Brian Haberman
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey-07.txt>
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-privacy-03
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey-07.txt>
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: draft-klensin-iaoc-member-01 (was: Re: I-D Action: draft-hardie-iaoc-iab-update-00.txt)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [dhcwg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dhc-anonymity-profile-06.txt> (Anonymity profile for DHCP clients) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• RE: [dhcwg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dhc-anonymity-profile-06.txt> (Anonymity profile for DHCP clients) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Christian Huitema
• Re: draft-klensin-iaoc-member-01 (was: Re: I-D Action: draft-hardie-iaoc-iab-update-00.txt)
  • From: Michael StJohns
• Re: [dhcwg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dhc-anonymity-profile-06.txt> (Anonymity profile for DHCP clients) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey-07.txt>
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: draft-klensin-iaoc-member-01 (was: Re: I-D Action: draft-hardie-iaoc-iab-update-00.txt)
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey-07.txt>
  • From: Paul Wouters
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey-07.txt>
  • From: Paul Wouters
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey-07.txt>
  • From: Paul Wouters
• Re: Gen-ART LC review: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-privacy-03
  • From: Robert Sparks
• RE: Gen-ART LC review: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-privacy-03
  • From: Bernie Volz (volz)
• Re: Gen-ART LC review: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-privacy-03
  • From: Robert Sparks
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey-07.txt>
  • From: Viktor Dukhovni
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey-07.txt>
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey-07.txt>
  • From: John Levine
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey-07.txt>
  • From: John Levine
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey-07.txt>
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey-07.txt>
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey-07.txt>
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey-07.txt>
  • From: E Taylor
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey-07.txt>
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey-07.txt>
  • From: E Taylor
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: [dhcwg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dhc-anonymity-profile-06.txt> (Anonymity profile for DHCP clients) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• draft-klensin-iaoc-member-01 (was: Re: I-D Action: draft-hardie-iaoc-iab-update-00.txt)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [dhcwg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dhc-anonymity-profile-06.txt> (Anonymity profile for DHCP clients) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• RE: [dhcwg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dhc-anonymity-profile-06.txt> (Anonymity profile for DHCP clients) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Christian Huitema
• RE: [dhcwg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dhc-anonymity-profile-06.txt> (Anonymity profile for DHCP clients) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Templin, Fred L
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Warren Kumari
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: Call for Comment: RFC Format Drafts
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: Call for Comment: RFC Format Drafts
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: [IAB] Call for Comment: RFC Format Drafts
  • From: Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)
• Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-eppext-tmch-smd-04
  • From: Russ Housley
• Re: [IAB] IAB@xxxxxxx mailing list closed, yet asks for comments?
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: [IAB] IAB@xxxxxxx mailing list closed, yet asks for comments?
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: Call for Comment: RFC Format Drafts
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: [IAB] IAB@xxxxxxx mailing list closed, yet asks for comments?
  • From: Doug Royer
• Re: [tsvwg] RtgDir review: draft-ietf-tsvwg-circuit-breaker-11.txt
  • From: gorry
• Re: [tsvwg] RtgDir review: draft-ietf-tsvwg-circuit-breaker-11.txt
  • From: Andrew G. Malis
• Re: Call for Comment: RFC Format Drafts
  • From: Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)
• Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt-06
  • From: Luigi Iannone
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Mark Andrews
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: [IAB] IAB@xxxxxxx mailing list closed, yet asks for comments?
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Mark Andrews
• Re: [IAB] IAB@xxxxxxx mailing list closed, yet asks for comments?
  • From: Doug Royer
• Re: Call for Comment: RFC Format Drafts
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: [IAB] IAB@xxxxxxx mailing list closed, yet asks for comments?
  • From: Cindy Morgan
• Re: [IAB] IAB@xxxxxxx mailing list closed, yet asks for comments?
  • From: Russ Housley
• IAB@xxxxxxx mailing list closed, yet asks for comments?
  • From: Doug Royer
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Joe Touch
• RE: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Templin, Fred L
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• RE: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Templin, Fred L
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-behave-ipfix-nat-logging-06.txt> (IPFIX Information Elements for logging NAT Events)
  • From: Paul Aitken
• Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-12.txt> "reasonable assurances" on Host Authentication and "h2c"
  • From: Kari Hurtta
• Re: I-D Action: draft-hardie-iaoc-iab-update-00.txt
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Alexey Eromenko
• Re: I-D Action: draft-hardie-iaoc-iab-update-00.txt
  • From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
• Re: I-D Action: draft-hardie-iaoc-iab-update-00.txt
  • From: Barry Leiba
• RE: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Templin, Fred L
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: IAOC being effective (Was: Re: I-D Action: draft-hardie-iaoc-iab-update-00.txt)
  • From: John C Klensin
• IAOC being effective (Was: Re: I-D Action: draft-hardie-iaoc-iab-update-00.txt)
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: I-D Action: draft-hardie-iaoc-iab-update-00.txt
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: I-D Action: draft-hardie-iaoc-iab-update-00.txt
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: joel jaeggli
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Not EUI-64 [was Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?]
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: wrt draft-ietf-uta-email-tls-certs
  • From: =JeffH
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: I-D Action: draft-hardie-iaoc-iab-update-00.txt
  • From: Joe Hildebrand
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Doug Royer
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey-07.txt> (Using DANE to Associate OpenPGP public keys with email addresses) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Warren Kumari
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey-07.txt> (Using DANE to Associate OpenPGP public keys with email addresses) to Experimental RFC
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: wrt draft-ietf-uta-email-tls-certs
  • From: Orit Levin (CELA)
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Warren Kumari
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Tony Finch
• Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey-07.txt> (Using DANE to Associate OpenPGP public keys with email addresses) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Paul Wouters
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Yoav Nir
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: wrt draft-ietf-uta-email-tls-certs
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: wrt draft-ietf-uta-email-tls-certs
  • From: =JeffH
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Warren Kumari
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Theodore V Faber
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• RE: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Ronald Bonica
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Mark Andrews
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Mark Andrews
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: David Borman
• Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-circuit-breaker-11
  • From: Roni Even
• RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt-06
  • From: Peter Yee
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Warren Kumari
• RE: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Ronald Bonica
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: David Borman
• Re: IETF mail server and SSLv3
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Alexey Eromenko
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: John Levine
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Yoav Nir
• Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt-06
  • From: Luigi Iannone
• Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt-06
  • From: Luigi Iannone
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Alexey Eromenko
• Re: IETF mail server and SSLv3
  • From: Lixia Zhang
• Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Yoav Nir
• Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
  • From: Alexey Eromenko
• Re: I-D Action: draft-hardie-iaoc-iab-update-00.txt
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: I-D Action: draft-hardie-iaoc-iab-update-00.txt
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: I-D Action: draft-hardie-iaoc-iab-update-00.txt
  • From: Michael StJohns
• Re: I-D Action: draft-hardie-iaoc-iab-update-00.txt
  • From: Suzanne Woolf
• Re: I-D Action: draft-hardie-iaoc-iab-update-00.txt
  • From: Andrew Sullivan
• Re: I-D Action: draft-hardie-iaoc-iab-update-00.txt
  • From: Andrew Sullivan
• Re: I-D Action: draft-hardie-iaoc-iab-update-00.txt
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: I-D Action: draft-hardie-iaoc-iab-update-00.txt
  • From: Scott O. Bradner
• Re: I-D Action: draft-hardie-iaoc-iab-update-00.txt
  • From: Michael StJohns
• Re: I-D Action: draft-hardie-iaoc-iab-update-00.txt
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: I-D Action: draft-hardie-iaoc-iab-update-00.txt
  • From: Michael StJohns
• Re: I-D Action: draft-hardie-iaoc-iab-update-00.txt
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: I-D Action: draft-hardie-iaoc-iab-update-00.txt
  • From: Scott O. Bradner
• Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt-06
  • From: Peter Yee
• Re: I-D Action: draft-hardie-iaoc-iab-update-00.txt
  • From: Andrew Sullivan
• Re: IETF mail server and SSLv3
  • From: Viktor Dukhovni
• Re: IETF mail server and SSLv3
  • From: Viktor Dukhovni
• RtgDir review: draft-ietf-tsvwg-circuit-breaker-11.txt
  • From: Andrew G. Malis
• Re: IETF mail server and SSLv3
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: IETF mail server and SSLv3
  • From: John Levine
• Re: IETF mail server and SSLv3
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: IETF mail server and SSLv3
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: IETF mail server and SSLv3
  • From: John C Klensin
• Security and Privacy Implications of Numeric Identifiers Employed in Network Protocols (Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-gont-predictable-numeric-ids-00.txt)
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: IETF mail server and SSLv3
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: IETF mail server and SSLv3
  • From: Viktor Dukhovni
• Re: IETF mail server and SSLv3
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: IETF mail server and SSLv3
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: IETF mail server and SSLv3
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: IETF mail server and SSLv3
  • From: Viktor Dukhovni
• Mentoring Feedback IETF 94 and Plans for Buenos Aires
  • From: nalini.elkins
• Re: IETF mail server and SSLv3
  • From: ned+ietf
• imap.ietf.org login
  • From: Marco Davids
• Re: [Uta] wrt draft-ietf-uta-email-tls-certs
  • From: Alexey Melnikov
• Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcp-privacy-03
  • From: Peter Yee
• Re: IETF mail server and SSLv3
  • From: Viktor Dukhovni
• Re: IETF mail server and SSLv3
  • From: ned+ietf
• FW: [secdir] SecDIr review: draft-holmberg-dispatch-pani-abnf-02
  • From: Olafur Gudmundsson
• Re: IETF mail server and SSLv3
  • From: Viktor Dukhovni
• Re: IETF mail server and SSLv3
  • From: John C Klensin
• IAOC != IETF Trust? [was: draft-hardie-iaoc-iab-update-00.txt]
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: I-D Action: draft-wilde-registries-01.txt
  • From: Erik Wilde
• Re: I-D Action: draft-hardie-iaoc-iab-update-00.txt
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-williams-exp-tcp-host-id-opt-07
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-williams-exp-tcp-host-id-opt-07
  • From: Paul Hoffman
• Re: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-williams-exp-tcp-host-id-opt-07
  • From: Martin Stiemerling
• Re: I-D Action: draft-wilde-registries-01.txt
  • From: Andrew G. Malis
• Re: I-D Action: draft-hardie-iaoc-iab-update-00.txt
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: I-D Action: draft-hardie-iaoc-iab-update-00.txt
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: I-D Action: draft-hardie-iaoc-iab-update-00.txt
  • From: Michael StJohns
• Re: IETF mail server and SSLv3
  • From: Viktor Dukhovni
• Re: I-D Action: draft-hardie-iaoc-iab-update-00.txt
  • From: Andrew Sullivan
• Re: I-D Action: draft-hardie-iaoc-iab-update-00.txt
  • From: John Levine
• Re: I-D Action: draft-hardie-iaoc-iab-update-00.txt
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: [codec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10.txt> (Ogg Encapsulation for the Opus Audio Codec) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Adam Roach
• Re: I-D Action: draft-hardie-iaoc-iab-update-00.txt
  • From: Andrew Sullivan
• Re: Last Call: <draft-mahesh-mef-urn-01.txt> (URN Namespace for MEF Documents) to Informational RFC
  • From: Mahesh Jethanandani
• Re: IETF mail server and SSLv3
  • From: Derek Atkins
• Re: IANA considerations and expert review across different streams (was Re: [IAB] Call for comment: <draft-iab-rfc5741bis-01> (On RFC Streams, Headers, and Boilerplates))
  • From: Graham Klyne
• Re: I-D Action: draft-hardie-iaoc-iab-update-00.txt
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: [codec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10.txt> (Ogg Encapsulation for the Opus Audio Codec) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Stephan Wenger
• Re: I-D Action: draft-hardie-iaoc-iab-update-00.txt
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: [codec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10.txt> (Ogg Encapsulation for the Opus Audio Codec) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Timothy B. Terriberry
• Re: I-D Action: draft-hardie-iaoc-iab-update-00.txt
  • From: Leslie Daigle
• Re: [codec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10.txt> (Ogg Encapsulation for the Opus Audio Codec) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Stephan Wenger
• Re: [codec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10.txt> (Ogg Encapsulation for the Opus Audio Codec) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Jean-Marc Valin
• Re: Last Call: <draft-mahesh-mef-urn-01.txt> (URN Namespace for MEF Documents) to Informational RFC
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: [codec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10.txt> (Ogg Encapsulation for the Opus Audio Codec) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Ron
• Re: [codec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10.txt> (Ogg Encapsulation for the Opus Audio Codec) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Jean-Marc Valin
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-netmod-opstate-reqs-04.txt> (Terminology and Requirements for Enhanced Handling of Operational State) to Informational RFC
  • From: Andy Bierman
• Re: [codec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10.txt> (Ogg Encapsulation for the Opus Audio Codec) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Ben Campbell
• Re: [codec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10.txt> (Ogg Encapsulation for the Opus Audio Codec) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Stephan Wenger
• Re: [codec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10.txt> (Ogg Encapsulation for the Opus Audio Codec) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Ben Campbell
• Re: I-D Action: draft-hardie-iaoc-iab-update-00.txt
  • From: Russ Housley
• Re: Last Call: <draft-mahesh-mef-urn-01.txt> (URN Namespace for MEF Documents) to Informational RFC
  • From: Barry Leiba
• RE: Last Call: <draft-mahesh-mef-urn-01.txt> (URN Namespace for MEF Documents) to Informational RFC
  • From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-netmod-opstate-reqs-04.txt> (Terminology and Requirements for Enhanced Handling of Operational State) to Informational RFC
  • From: tom p.
• Re: [codec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10.txt> (Ogg Encapsulation for the Opus Audio Codec) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Scott Kitterman
• Re: [codec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10.txt> (Ogg Encapsulation for the Opus Audio Codec) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Timothy B. Terriberry
• Changes in using the global whitelist on IETF lists
  • From: IETF Chair
• Re: [codec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10.txt> (Ogg Encapsulation for the Opus Audio Codec) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Ron
• Re: [codec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10.txt> (Ogg Encapsulation for the Opus Audio Codec) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Timothy B. Terriberry
• Re: [codec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10.txt> (Ogg Encapsulation for the Opus Audio Codec) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Ron
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10.txt> (Ogg Encapsulation for the Opus Audio Codec) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Ron
• Re: I-D Action: draft-hardie-iaoc-iab-update-00.txt
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: [codec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10.txt> (Ogg Encapsulation for the Opus Audio Codec) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: [codec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10.txt> (Ogg Encapsulation for the Opus Audio Codec) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Stephan Wenger
• Re: [codec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10.txt> (Ogg Encapsulation for the Opus Audio Codec) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Timothy B. Terriberry
• Re: I-D Action: draft-hardie-iaoc-iab-update-00.txt
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: [codec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10.txt> (Ogg Encapsulation for the Opus Audio Codec) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Stephan Wenger
• Re: I-D Action: draft-hardie-iaoc-iab-update-00.txt
  • From: Lou Berger
• Re: [codec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10.txt> (Ogg Encapsulation for the Opus Audio Codec) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Timothy B. Terriberry
• Re: I-D Action: draft-hardie-iaoc-iab-update-00.txt
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: I-D Action: draft-hardie-iaoc-iab-update-00.txt
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: I-D Action: draft-hardie-iaoc-iab-update-00.txt
  • From: Michael StJohns
• Re: I-D Action: draft-hardie-iaoc-iab-update-00.txt
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: I-D Action: draft-hardie-iaoc-iab-update-00.txt
  • From: Bob Hinden
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10.txt> (Ogg Encapsulation for the Opus Audio Codec) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Robert Sparks
• Re: I-D Action: draft-hardie-iaoc-iab-update-00.txt
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: [codec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10.txt> (Ogg Encapsulation for the Opus Audio Codec) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Ben Campbell
• Re: I-D Action: draft-hardie-iaoc-iab-update-00.txt
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: I-D Action: draft-hardie-iaoc-iab-update-00.txt
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: A standard for XML - JSON mapping.
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: A standard for XML - JSON mapping.
  • From: tom p.
• Gen-ART LC review: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-privacy-03
  • From: Robert Sparks
• Re: [core] Last Call: <draft-ietf-core-block-18.txt> (Block-wise transfers in CoAP) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Göran Selander
• RE: Review of draft-williams-exp-tcp-host-id-opt-07
  • From: Scharf, Michael (Nokia - DE)
• RE: Review of draft-williams-exp-tcp-host-id-opt-07
  • From: mohamed.boucadair
• wrt draft-ietf-uta-email-tls-certs
  • From: =JeffH
• Re: [core] Last Call: <draft-ietf-core-block-18.txt> (Block-wise transfers in CoAP) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• RE: [core] Last Call: <draft-ietf-core-block-18.txt> (Block-wise transfers in CoAP) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Jim Schaad
• Re: [core] Last Call: <draft-ietf-core-block-18.txt> (Block-wise transfers in CoAP) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Göran Selander
• Re: A standard for XML - JSON mapping.
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• RE: [core] Last Call: <draft-ietf-core-block-18.txt> (Block-wise transfers in CoAP) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Jim Schaad
• Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-williams-exp-tcp-host-id-opt-07
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Updated Changes to IAOC Admin Procedures for Review
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-williams-exp-tcp-host-id-opt-07
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: Updated Changes to IAOC Admin Procedures for Review
  • From: Scott O. Bradner
• Updated Changes to IAOC Admin Procedures for Review
  • From: IETF Administrative Director
• Re: Updated Changes to IAOC Admin Procedures for Review
  • From: Scott O. Bradner
• Re: A standard for XML - JSON mapping.
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: A standard for XML - JSON mapping.
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: A standard for XML - JSON mapping.
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: [core] Last Call: <draft-ietf-core-block-18.txt> (Block-wise transfers in CoAP) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Göran Selander
• Re: A standard for XML - JSON mapping.
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries
  • From: Mark Nottingham
• A standard for XML - JSON mapping.
  • From: Jeyan Gopalakrishnan
• Review of draft-williams-exp-tcp-host-id-opt-07
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-williams-exp-tcp-host-id-opt-07
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-williams-exp-tcp-host-id-opt-07
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• RE: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-williams-exp-tcp-host-id-opt-07
  • From: Dr. Sandeep Joshi [MU - Jaipur]
• Re: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-williams-exp-tcp-host-id-opt-07
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-williams-exp-tcp-host-id-opt-07
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: AirBnB, was Re: Hotel situation
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• RE: [core] Last Call: <draft-ietf-core-block-18.txt> (Block-wise transfers in CoAP) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Jim Schaad
• Re: AirBnB, was Re: Hotel situation
  • From: John Levine
• AirBnB, was Re: Hotel situation
  • From: Livingood, Jason
• Re: [codec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10.txt> (Ogg Encapsulation for the Opus Audio Codec) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Scott Kitterman
• Re: [codec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10.txt> (Ogg Encapsulation for the Opus Audio Codec) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Ron
• Re: [codec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10.txt> (Ogg Encapsulation for the Opus Audio Codec) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Ron
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10.txt> (Ogg Encapsulation for the Opus Audio Codec) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Ron
• Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Ietf-and-github -- Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups
  • From: Benson Schliesser
• Re: [codec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10.txt> (Ogg Encapsulation for the Opus Audio Codec) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Jean-Marc Valin
• Re: [codec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10.txt> (Ogg Encapsulation for the Opus Audio Codec) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Jean-Marc Valin
• Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Ietf-and-github -- Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups
  • From: Andrew G. Malis
• Re: long-term archiving
  • From: Theodore V Faber
• Re: long-term archiving
  • From: Jim Gettys
• Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Ietf-and-github -- Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: long-term archiving
  • From: Tony Finch
• Re: [core] Last Call: <draft-ietf-core-block-18.txt> (Block-wise transfers in CoAP) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: [codec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10.txt> (Ogg Encapsulation for the Opus Audio Codec) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• Re: long-term archiving
  • From: John R Levine
• Re: long-term archiving
  • From: Randy Fischer
• Re: long-term archiving
  • From: lloyd.wood
• Re: long-term archiving
  • From: lloyd.wood
• Re: long-term archiving
  • From: John Levine
• Re: long-term archiving
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: long-term archiving
  • From: Randy Fischer
• Re: long-term archiving
  • From: Theodore V Faber
• Re: long-term archiving
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: long-term archiving
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: long-term archiving
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: DISPATCH and strategies for standards maintenance
  • From: Ben Campbell
• Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Ietf-and-github -- Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups
  • From: Doug Barton
• Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Ietf-and-github -- Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups
  • From: Doug Barton
• RE: [core] Last Call: <draft-ietf-core-block-18.txt> (Block-wise transfers in CoAP) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Jim Schaad
• Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Ietf-and-github -- Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: [codec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10.txt> (Ogg Encapsulation for the Opus Audio Codec) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Timothy B. Terriberry
• Re: [codec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10.txt> (Ogg Encapsulation for the Opus Audio Codec) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• Re: DISPATCH and strategies for standards maintenance
  • From: Adam Roach
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10.txt> (Ogg Encapsulation for the Opus Audio Codec) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• Re: long-term archiving
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: long-term archiving
  • From: Theodore V Faber
• Re: long-term archiving
  • From: John Levine
• Re: long-term archiving
  • From: Dirk-Willem van Gulik
• Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Ietf-and-github -- Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups
  • From: Ross Finlayson
• Re: long-term archiving
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: long-term archiving
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: long-term archiving
  • From: Alessandro Vesely
• Early review of the RFC Format documents welcome
  • From: IAB Executive Administrative Manager
• all for RFC Series Oversight Committee (RSOC) Nominations
  • From: IAB Executive Administrative Manager
• Re: DISPATCH and strategies for standards maintenance
  • From: Alissa Cooper
• Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Ietf-and-github -- Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups
  • From: Bob Hinden
• 答复: RFC format evolution and IETF documents
  • From: ao . ting
• Re: long-term archiving
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: long-term archiving (was: Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Ietf-and-github -- ...)
  • From: Theodore V Faber
• Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Ietf-and-github -- Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Ietf-and-github -- Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups
  • From: Tony Finch
• long-term archiving (was: Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Ietf-and-github -- ...)
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Ietf-and-github -- Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: Last Call: <status-change-copspr-sppi-to-historic-00.txt> (Reclassification of COPS-PR and SPPI (RFC 3084, 3159, 3317, 3318, and 3571) to Historic) to Historic
  • From: Bert Wijnen (IETF)
• Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Ietf-and-github -- Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups
  • From: Jari Arkko
• RE: Last Call: <status-change-copspr-sppi-to-historic-00.txt> (Reclassification of COPS-PR and SPPI (RFC 3084, 3159, 3317, 3318, and 3571) to Historic) to Historic
  • From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
• Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Ietf-and-github -- Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Ietf-and-github -- Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups
  • From: Doug Royer
• Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Ietf-and-github -- Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups
  • From: Ross Finlayson
• Re: Last Call: <draft-campbell-art-rfc5727-update-02.txt> (Improving the Organizational Flexibility of the SIP Change Process.) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Ben Campbell
• Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Ietf-and-github -- Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Last Call: <draft-campbell-art-rfc5727-update-02.txt> (Improving the Organizational Flexibility of the SIP Change Process.) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Ben Campbell
• Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Ietf-and-github -- Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups
  • From: Doug Barton
• Re: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-williams-exp-tcp-host-id-opt-07
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10.txt> (Ogg Encapsulation for the Opus Audio Codec) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Ben Campbell
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10.txt> (Ogg Encapsulation for the Opus Audio Codec) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Robert Sparks
• Re: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-williams-exp-tcp-host-id-opt-07
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• IANA considerations and expert review across different streams (was Re: [IAB] Call for comment: <draft-iab-rfc5741bis-01> (On RFC Streams, Headers, and Boilerplates))
  • From: Robert Sparks
• Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Ietf-and-github -- Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups
  • From: Doug Royer
• Re: xml2rfc as a requirement for authors?
  • From: HANSEN, TONY L
• Re: RFC format evolution and IETF documents
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-williams-exp-tcp-host-id-opt-07
  • From: Ted Hardie
• RFC format evolution and IETF documents
  • From: IETF Chair
• Re: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-williams-exp-tcp-host-id-opt-07
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-williams-exp-tcp-host-id-opt-07
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Ietf-and-github -- Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-williams-exp-tcp-host-id-opt-07
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Ietf-and-github -- Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups
  • From: Tony Finch
• Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Ietf-and-github -- Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-williams-exp-tcp-host-id-opt-07
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Ietf-and-github -- Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Ietf-and-github -- Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Ietf-and-github -- Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Ietf-and-github -- Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Ietf-and-github -- Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Ietf-and-github -- Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Ietf-and-github -- Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Ietf-and-github -- Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Ietf-and-github -- Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups
  • From: Benson Schliesser
• Re: IETF mail server and SSLv3
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Ietf-and-github -- Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: IETF mail server and SSLv3
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Ietf-and-github -- Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups
  • From: Paul Hoffman
• Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Ietf-and-github -- Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups
  • From: Ross Finlayson
• Re: IETF mail server and SSLv3
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: IETF mail server and SSLv3
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: IETF mail server and SSLv3
  • From: tom p.
• RE: Should I make and donate a patent to Open Invention Network?
  • From: Dr. Sandeep Joshi [MU - Jaipur]
• IETF mail server and SSLv3
  • From: IETF Chair
• Call for feedback and nominations for the IAOC appointment by the IESG
  • From: IETF Chair
• Re: Should I make and donate a patent to Open Invention Network?
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: Should I make and donate a patent to Open Invention Network?
  • From: GTW
• Re: Should I make and donate a patent to Open Invention Network?
  • From: Eric Burger
• Re: Should I make and donate a patent to Open Invention Network?
  • From: John Levine
• Re: Should I make and donate a patent to Open Invention Network?
  • From: Behcet Sarikaya
• Re: Should I make and donate a patent to Open Invention Network?
  • From: Toerless Eckert
• Re: Should I make and donate a patent to Open Invention Network?
  • From: John Levine
• Should I make and donate a patent to Open Invention Network?
  • From: Alexey Eromenko
• Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries
  • From: Patrik Fältström
• Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries
  • From: Cyrus Daboo
• Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries
  • From: Patrik Fältström
• Re: DISPATCH and strategies for standards maintenance
  • From: John Levine
• Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries
  • From: Eggert, Lars
• Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries
  • From: Eggert, Lars
• Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries
  • From: Eggert, Lars
• DISPATCH and strategies for standards maintenance
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries
  • From: Joe Hildebrand
• Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries
  • From: Joe Touch
• IAOC/IASA procedureal documents (was: Re: Proposed Changes to IAOC Admin Procedures for Review)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-client-subnet-06
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-dnsop-cookies-09
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries
  • From: Roy T. Fielding
• Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• IAOC - was Re: [IAOC] Proposed Changes to IAOC Admin Procedures for Review
  • From: Scott O. Bradner
• Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries
  • From: Mark Nottingham
• Re: Proposed Changes to IAOC Admin Procedures for Review
  • From: Scott O. Bradner
• Re: Proposed Changes to IAOC Admin Procedures for Review
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries
  • From: Joe Touch
• Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-dnsop-cookies-09
  • From: Peter Yee
• Re: Proposed Changes to IAOC Admin Procedures for Review
  • From: Scott O. Bradner
• Re: Proposed Changes to IAOC Admin Procedures for Review
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries
  • From: John C Klensin
• RE: On IETF policy for protocol registries
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Proposed Changes to IAOC Admin Procedures for Review
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: Proposed Changes to IAOC Admin Procedures for Review
  • From: John C Klensin
• Proposed Changes to IAOC Admin Procedures for Review
  • From: IETF Administrative Director
• Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries
  • From: Matthew Kerwin
• Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: yang model easy editor
  • From: Benoit Claise
• Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries
  • From: tom p.
• Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10
  • From: Ron
• Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10
  • From: Ralph Giles
• Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries
  • From: Eggert, Lars
• Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries
  • From: Matthew Kerwin
• Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries
  • From: Eggert, Lars
• Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries
  • From: Joe Hildebrand
• On IETF policy for protocol registries
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Venue Data for Upcoming Meetings was Re: Hotel situation
  • From: Ray Pelletier
• Re: IETF turns 30
  • From: Alexandre Petrescu
• Re: IETF turns 30
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: IETF turns 30
  • From: Scott Brim
• Re: IETF turns 30
  • From: Lixia Zhang
• Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10
  • From: Ben Campbell
• Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10
  • From: Timothy B. Terriberry
• Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• IANA customer survey 2015
  • From: IETF Chair
• [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-client-subnet-06
  • From: Russ Housley
• Re: IETF turns 30
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: IETF turns 30
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: IETF turns 30
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: IETF turns 30
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: yang model easy editor
  • From: Riccardo Bernardini
• Re: yang model easy editor
  • From: Doug Ewell
• Re: IETF turns 30
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: IETF turns 30
  • From: Alexandre Petrescu
• RE: IETF turns 30
  • From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
• RE: IETF turns 30
  • From: Mikael Abrahamsson
• RE: IETF turns 30
  • From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
• IETF turns 30
  • From: IETF Chair
• IAB workshop on IOT semantic interoperability
  • From: IETF Chair
• Re: On email and web security
  • From: George Michaelson
• Re: On email and web security
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: On email and web security
  • From: Doug Barton
• Re: On email and web security
  • From: John Levine
• Re: On email and web security
  • From: Doug Barton
• Re: On email and web security
  • From: John Levine
• Re: On email and web security
  • From: Doug Royer
• yang model easy editor
  • From: Hosnieh Rafiee
• Re: On email and web security
  • From: Matthew Kerwin
• Re: On email and web security
  • From: Doug Royer
• Re: On email and web security
  • From: Doug Barton
• Re: IETF hotel selection mode and a proposal (was" Re: Hilton BA is Booked already?)
  • From: Randall Gellens
• Re: On email and web security
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: On email and web security
  • From: Dave Cridland
• Re: On email and web security
  • From: Doug Barton
• Re: On email and web security
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Joyce Reynolds
  • From: Doug Barton
• Re: On email and web security
  • From: Doug Barton
• Re: IETF hotel selection mode and a proposal (was" Re: Hilton BA is Booked already?)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: IETF hotel selection mode and a proposal (was" Re: Hilton BA is Booked already?)
  • From: Randall Gellens
• Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Oauth-security-reports -- Information about security vulnerabilities concerning the OAuth specifications and OAuth implementations
  • From: Philip Kizer
• Re: IETF hotel selection mode and a proposal (was" Re: Hilton BA is Booked already?)
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: IETF hotel selection mode and a proposal (was" Re: Hilton BA is Booked already?)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: IETF hotel selection mode and a proposal (was" Re: Hilton BA is Booked already?)
  • From: John Levine
• Re: IETF hotel selection mode and a proposal (was" Re: Hilton BA is Booked already?)
  • From: Randall Gellens
• Starting new work at the IETF & BOF deadline reminder
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: ever more hypothetical Hotel situation
  • From: Theodore V Faber
• RE: ever more hypothetical Hotel situation
  • From: Christer Holmberg
• Re: ever more hypothetical Hotel situation
  • From: John Levine
• Re: Hotel situation
  • From: Ole Jacobsen
• Re: Hotel situation
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Virtual BOFs
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: email change
  • From: Alexey Eromenko
• email change
  • From: Dr. Sandeep Joshi [MU - Jaipur]
• Re: Hotel situation
  • From: Toerless Eckert
• Re: Hotel situation
  • From: Randall Gellens
• Re: Virtual BOFs
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Venue Announcement for IETFs 98, 99, 102 and 111
  • From: Doug Barton
• Re: Virtual BOFs
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Virtual BOFs
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Hotel situation
  • From: Lloyd Wood
• Re: Virtual BOFs
  • From: Brian E Carpenter