RE: Last Call: <draft-schoenw-opsawg-copspr-historic-03.txt> (Reclassification of COPS-PR and SPPI to Historic) to Informational RFC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Same as Bert, and for the same reasons I support the reclassification of COPS-PR and SPPI to historic. 

Regards,

Dan


> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf [mailto:ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bert Wijnen (IETF)
> Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 4:01 PM
> To: ietf@xxxxxxxx
> Cc: draft-schoenw-opsawg-copspr-historic@xxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-schoenw-opsawg-copspr-historic-03.txt>
> (Reclassification of COPS-PR and SPPI to Historic) to Informational RFC
> 
> I support moving COPS-PR to historic.
> As far as I know, it never really picked up traction in the industry.
> 
> Bert
> 
> On 02/03/16 15:56, The IESG wrote:
> >
> > The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to
> > consider the following document:
> > - 'Reclassification of COPS-PR and SPPI to Historic'
> >    <draft-schoenw-opsawg-copspr-historic-03.txt> as Informational RFC
> >





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]