I support moving COPS-PR to historic. As far as I know, it never really picked up traction in the industry. Bert On 02/03/16 15:56, The IESG wrote:
The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider the following document: - 'Reclassification of COPS-PR and SPPI to Historic' <draft-schoenw-opsawg-copspr-historic-03.txt> as Informational RFC To follow the procedure 2 at http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/designating-rfcs-as-historic.html, we need an IETF Last Call for this draft. Note that https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-copspr-sppi-to-historic/ had already its 2 weeks IETF Last Call The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the ietf@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2016-03-30. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. Abstract This memo reclassifies RFC 3084, COPS Usage for Policy Provisioning, and RFC 3159, Structure of Policy Provisioning Information, to Historic status. This memo obsoletes RFC 3084, RFC 3159, RFC 3317, RFC 3318, and RFC 3571. The file can be obtained via https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-schoenw-opsawg-copspr-historic/ IESG discussion can be tracked via https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-schoenw-opsawg-copspr-historic/ballot/ No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.