On 23/02/16 10:59, Fernando Gont wrote: > > I'm not saying the above is good or bad, but that's an update, and > deserves a corresponding "update tag". FWIW, I've no opinion here but please be aware that different working definitions of the "updates" relationship are concurrently in use in different bits of the IETF. For some, it means "you really need to read this" for others its "a new implementer of the old thing really needs to also include the new code" and those aren't always the same. There are probably other not-unreasonable meanings one could come up with too. I'd not get hung up on it generally myself. S.
<<attachment: smime.p7s>>