On 02/22/2016 08:51 PM, Lorenzo Colitti wrote: > On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 7:18 AM, Fernando Gont <fgont@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > <mailto:fgont@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > > > When these options enable stateless address configuration (i.e., when > > the A flag in a Prefix Information Option is set to 1) hosts using the > > anonymity profile SHOULD perform stateless address configuration > > and SHOULD NOT use stateful DHCPv6, because stateless configuration > > > > I don't see how that text is different from the text that's already in > > the draft, except it actually provides clear guidance. Why not use it? > > The above text (or any similar text already in the I-D) suggests that > this document should be updating RFC4862. Because it is not only > specifying that to do when you do DHCPv6, but also whether to do > SLAAC/DHCPv6 in the fist place. > > > I don't see why. I don't recall a statement in RFC 4862 specifying > whether hosts should use one or the other. But the authors are making such statement here. i.e., if you are going to implement SLAAC/DHCPv6, then this statement affects your implementation. Hence, an appropriate tag should be included (i.e., such that if I look at RFC4862 or RFC3315, it's clear that I should look at this document, too). Thanks, -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: fgont@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492