Re: [dhcwg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dhc-anonymity-profile-06.txt> (Anonymity profile for DHCP clients) to Proposed Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 7:59 PM, Fernando Gont <fgont@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I still don't see why this document needs to formally "updates: RFC
> 4862" if it doesn't affect any text in it.

RFC4861/RFC4862 say that when M=1 you do SLAAC. Here you are saying that
if you have a PIO with A=1, you should not do DHCPv6. That's an update
to the existing specs.

Cite RFC4861/4862 text or your statement is unsupported and unactionable.

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]