Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-behave-ipfix-nat-logging-06.txt> (IPFIX Information Elements for logging NAT Events)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Senthil, I hadn't realised you'd published a new version of the draft. Please CC me if/when you update it again.

I've quickly reviewed the diffs between -06 and -07 :


1. Terminology

" Any non-IPFIX terminology used to convey NAT events are described in this section."

-> which section is "this" referring to? Since this paragraph seems only to serve as an introduction to the third paragraph which only contains a single exception, would it be better to remove these two lines and go directly to the third paragraph? :
   However, that causes
   confusion in terminology used in NAT specific terms and IPFIX IEs.
   Any non-IPFIX terminology used to convey NAT events are described in
   this section.


2. Introduction
"This document details the IPFIX Information Elements(IEs)"
-> No need to repeat "(IEs)" since this was already explained in the Terminology section.

-> Remove the duplicated text:
   The IPFIX Protocol [RFC7011] defines a generic push mechanism for
   exporting information and events.  The IPFIX Information Model
   [IPFIX-IANA] defines a set of standard IEs which can be carried by
   the IPFIX protocol.  This document details the IPFIX Information
   Elements(IEs) that MUST be logged by a NAT device that supports NAT
   logging using IPFIX.  This document details the IPFIX Information
   Elements(IEs) that MUST be logged by a NAT device that supports NAT
   logging using IPFIX, and all the optional fields.  The fields
   specified in this document are gleaned from [RFC4787] and [RFC5382].


5.4. Quota exceeded Event types

-> In the "
The events that can be reported are ...", I'd like to see the text be identical to the items listed in table 3 to remove any possible ambiguity.



5.6.8.4. Global Address mapping high threshold reached

-> Extra whitespace at the period: "paired address pooling behavior ."



8.1. New Information Elements / natLimitEvent, natThresholdEvent,

-> typo: " describer in Table below."

-> you should remove the "Table 22" and "Table 23" descriptions under those tables, because these won't make any sense when the text is transcribed into IANA's registry. E



8.2. Modified Information Elements / natEvent

-> Again, you can't modify the definitions of the existing values.


P.




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]