Re: Proposed IETF Privacy Policy for Review

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



in addition “it is the right thing to do”

Scott

> On Mar 16, 2016, at 4:08 PM, Scott O. Bradner <sob@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> IETF Secretariat
> c/o Association Management Solutions, LLC (AMS)
> 48377 Fremont Blvd., Suite 117
> Fremont, California 94538
> 
>> On Mar 16, 2016, at 1:37 PM, John Levine <johnl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>>> but, even if we clearly say “we never do that” we still need to have the section since 
>>> California law says that we need to have such an ability for people to ask  (its also the kind of thing that the EU
>>> wants to see)
>> 
>> Why is California law relevant?  The IETF's legal bits are in Virgina
>> or maybe D.C., not California.
>> 
>> R's,
>> John
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]