> On Feb 27, 2016, at 12:39 PM, John C Klensin <john-ietf@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > --On Saturday, February 27, 2016 12:35 -0800 Barry Leiba > <barryleiba@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> NEW: >>> If ISOC further modifies [ISOC-By-Laws] concerning the >>> number of IETF appointments to the ISOC Board or the >>> timing thereof, the IAB may make corresponding >>> modifications to the frequency and the timing of the >>> processes embodied in this document, pending any >>> modification to this document. Such changes will be >>> announced via an IAB statement. >> >> I think a change such as that would be good. > > I agree but, if the intent is that the IAB modifications and > statement are a stopgap, to avoid discontinuities, etc., but > that the IAB is still expected to move expeditiously to get the > BCP updated, that could be said a lot more clearly. I agree. The IAB shouldn’t delay it’s board appointment until this document is updated, but it should do an update in a reasonable amount of time. Thanks, Bob
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail