> I agree with you. I didn't actually advocate the minimalist version; > I just wanted to point out that we need a BCP in any case. > > So, I suggest something like this: > > OLD: > If ISOC further modifies [ISOC-By-Laws] concerning the number of IAB > appointments to the ISOC Board or the timing thereof, the IAB will > make reasonable modifications to the processes embodied in this > document, without requiring further modification to this document. > Such changes will be announced via an IAB statement. > > NEW: > If ISOC further modifies [ISOC-By-Laws] concerning the number of IETF > appointments to the ISOC Board or the timing thereof, the IAB may > make corresponding modifications to the frequency and the timing of > the processes embodied in this document, pending any modification to > this document. Such changes will be announced via an IAB statement. I think a change such as that would be good. Barry