Well, OK. NEW NEW: If ISOC further modifies [ISOC-By-Laws] concerning the number of IETF appointments to the ISOC Board or the timing thereof, the IAB may make corresponding modifications to the frequency and the timing of the processes embodied in this document. Such changes will be announced via an IAB statement. The IAB must then propose a corresponding update to this document within one year. Regards Brian On 29/02/2016 05:11, Bob Hinden wrote: > >> On Feb 27, 2016, at 12:39 PM, John C Klensin <john-ietf@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> >> >> --On Saturday, February 27, 2016 12:35 -0800 Barry Leiba >> <barryleiba@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>>> NEW: >>>> If ISOC further modifies [ISOC-By-Laws] concerning the >>>> number of IETF appointments to the ISOC Board or the >>>> timing thereof, the IAB may make corresponding >>>> modifications to the frequency and the timing of the >>>> processes embodied in this document, pending any >>>> modification to this document. Such changes will be >>>> announced via an IAB statement. >>> >>> I think a change such as that would be good. >> >> I agree but, if the intent is that the IAB modifications and >> statement are a stopgap, to avoid discontinuities, etc., but >> that the IAB is still expected to move expeditiously to get the >> BCP updated, that could be said a lot more clearly. > > I agree. The IAB shouldn’t delay it’s board appointment until this document is updated, but it should do an update in a reasonable amount of time. > > Thanks, > Bob > >