On 3/17/16 2:50 AM, Josh Howlett wrote: >> The takeaway for me is that the end-to-end principle is dead. The >> times where all intelligence should be in end hosts only, no >> middleboxes, and KISS have gone, and techniques going in the >> opposite direction are not only in use, but even embraced by IETF >> operations. > > +1 > > But the fact that these solutions exist points to a need unmet by > existing e2e approaches. Someone in IETF operations had presumably > thought out their requirements when this service was procured. > Embedding e2e within a solution that satisfies those same operational > requirements sounds like a potential IETF WG charter in the making. I'm not really sure what you folks are talking about anymore. A CDN whether internal or a third party is an extension of the applications stack, not a bump in the wire. building scalable performant low latency services is a distributed systems problem and there are a number of areas of the ietf activity (all of them probably) involved in doing. > Josh. > > Jisc is a registered charity (number 1149740) and a company limited > by guarantee which is registered in England under Company No. > 5747339, VAT No. GB 197 0632 86. Jisc’s registered office is: One > Castlepark, Tower Hill, Bristol, BS2 0JA. T 0203 697 5800. > > Jisc Services Limited is a wholly owned Jisc subsidiary and a company > limited by guarantee which is registered in England under company > number 2881024, VAT number GB 197 0632 86. The registered office is: > One Castle Park, Tower Hill, Bristol BS2 0JA. T 0203 697 5800. > >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature