Re: Proposed New Note Well

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: ietf@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Proposed New Note Well
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 14:14:52 +1300
In-reply-to: <20160321165157.31914.47506.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.0

Hi,

I could live with this, although I am still happy enough with the old version.

> By participating in the IETF,

I think this should say

 By participating in the IETF in person, remotely, or on-line,

> BCP 25 (Working Group processes)
> BCP 25 (Anti-Harassment Procedures)

Why two separate lines, when BCP 9 (6 different RFCs) only gets one line?

Regards
   Brian

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Proposed New Note Well
  - From: Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: Proposed New Note Well
  - From: lloyd.wood

Prev by Date: Re: Observations on (non-technical) changes affecting IETF operations
Next by Date: Re: Proposed New Note Well
Previous by thread: Re: Proposed New Note Well
Next by thread: Re: Proposed New Note Well
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]