At Tue, 16 Feb 2016 10:13:49 -0800, "Christian Huitema" <huitema@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I'm not sure what Brian tried to indicate in his message, but at least this > > section looks vague to me about the rationale for the "SHOULD NOT". It's > > not obvious to me how IA_PD is worse than IA_NA in terms of privacy. Is this > > a "SHOULD NOT" simply because the "interaction" > > (is not yet fully understood and) requires further study? > > This section was rewritten in draft-07, following the feedback received during IETF last call. Basically, we stopped being lazy and actually did the study. And took a lot of the text that Lorenzo provided. I didn't intend to make my comment as a blocking issue for the last call, but just to be clear: The revised section 4.5.2 of rev 07 looks good to me. -- JINMEI, Tatuya