Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 17, 2016, at 08:13, Scott Bradner <sob@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I agree but the law is what the law is > > see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Children's_Online_Privacy_Protection_Act > > the wording used says that its fine if the kid has parental OK But then there is no need to say our website is not designed for people under 13. They are designed for people of all ages. Paul > Scott > >> On Mar 17, 2016, at 8:09 AM, Paul Wouters <paul@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> My only issue is that it claims our websites are not for use by children under 13. They most certainly are. >> >> Paul >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>> On Mar 17, 2016, at 03:01, Eggert, Lars <lars@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Ray, >>> >>> would this extend to and cover the IRTF as well? >>> >>> Lars >>> >>>> On 2016-03-16, at 18:02, IETF Administrative Director <iad@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>> The IAOC would like community input on a proposed IETF Privacy Policy. >>>> >>>> We are required by California law (and good net citizenship) to have >>>> an accurate privacy policy on our websites. Counsel have reviewed >>>> this statement for compliance with US and EU privacy regulations. >>>> >>>> The policy discusses the following: >>>> 1. General – Most Personal Data Submitted to IETF Will Become Public >>>> 2. You Consent to International Transmission of Your Data >>>> 3. Exceptions – Information That We Do Not Release to the Public >>>> 4. Security >>>> 5. Children >>>> 6. Inquiries >>>> 7. Compliance >>>> 8. Other Organizations >>>> 9. Consent >>>> >>>> The proposed Privacy Policy is located here: >>>> http://iaoc.ietf.org/documents/IETF-General-Privacy-Statement-2016-02-24-02.htm >>>> >>>> The IAOC will consider all comments received by 31 March 2016. >>>> >>>> Ray Pelletier >>>> IETF Administrative Director >>