I agree but the law is what the law is see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Children's_Online_Privacy_Protection_Act the wording used says that its fine if the kid has parental OK Scott > On Mar 17, 2016, at 8:09 AM, Paul Wouters <paul@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > My only issue is that it claims our websites are not for use by children under 13. They most certainly are. > > Paul > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Mar 17, 2016, at 03:01, Eggert, Lars <lars@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Hi Ray, >> >> would this extend to and cover the IRTF as well? >> >> Lars >> >>> On 2016-03-16, at 18:02, IETF Administrative Director <iad@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> The IAOC would like community input on a proposed IETF Privacy Policy. >>> >>> We are required by California law (and good net citizenship) to have >>> an accurate privacy policy on our websites. Counsel have reviewed >>> this statement for compliance with US and EU privacy regulations. >>> >>> The policy discusses the following: >>> 1. General – Most Personal Data Submitted to IETF Will Become Public >>> 2. You Consent to International Transmission of Your Data >>> 3. Exceptions – Information That We Do Not Release to the Public >>> 4. Security >>> 5. Children >>> 6. Inquiries >>> 7. Compliance >>> 8. Other Organizations >>> 9. Consent >>> >>> The proposed Privacy Policy is located here: >>> http://iaoc.ietf.org/documents/IETF-General-Privacy-Statement-2016-02-24-02.htm >>> >>> The IAOC will consider all comments received by 31 March 2016. >>> >>> Ray Pelletier >>> IETF Administrative Director >> >