|
The disclosure obligation is personal, by design. Whether you consider this good or bad depends on your viewpoint…
Stephan
From: ietf <ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx> on behalf of "lloyd.wood@xxxxxxxxxxx" <lloyd.wood@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: "lloyd.wood@xxxxxxxxxxx" <lloyd.wood@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Monday, March 21, 2016 at 18:56 To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx>, "ietf@xxxxxxxx" <ietf@xxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: Proposed New Note Well What about participating in the IETF by proxy,
which is what corporations do?
Lloyd Wood lloyd.wood@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://about.me/lloydwood
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx> To: ietf@xxxxxxxx Sent: Tuesday, 22 March 2016, 12:14 Subject: Re: Proposed New Note Well Hi, I could live with this, although I am still happy enough with the old version. > By participating in the IETF, I think this should say By participating in the IETF in person, remotely, or on-line, > BCP 25 (Working Group processes) > BCP 25 (Anti-Harassment Procedures) Why two separate lines, when BCP 9 (6 different RFCs) only gets one line? Regards Brian |