On 3/17/2016 4:13 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > I also recall rumours that some people were actually using ST2 at one point. > Are we sure that it's totally gone away? There were a number of ST2 (RFC1190) and ST2+ (RFC1819) deployments at one point (in Japan, US and Germany). I don't believe any are still in operation and historic sounds just fine to me. Lou (Co-chair of ST2+ WG, co-editor of RFC1819 -- also worked on and deployed some ST implementations) > Regards > Brian Carpenter > > On 18/03/2016 08:15, The IESG wrote: >> The IESG has received a request from the Internet Engineering Steering >> Group IETF (iesg) to consider the following document: >> - 'Moving IP versions 5, 8, and 9 to Historic' >> <status-change-ip-versions-5-8-9-to-historic-01.txt> as Historic >> >> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits >> final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the >> ietf@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2016-04-14. Exceptionally, comments may be >> sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the >> beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. >> >> The file can be obtained via >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-ip-versions-5-8-9-to-historic/ >> >> IESG discussion can be tracked via >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-ip-versions-5-8-9-to-historic/ballot/ >> >> >> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. >> >> >> >