All, On 2/23/16 7:50 AM, Tim Chown wrote: >> On 23 Feb 2016, at 12:47, Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 8:06 PM, Fernando Gont <fgont@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:fgont@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >> That's actually the contrary of what the specs say today: if M=1 you do >> DHCPv6, not SLAAC. >> >> I don't see any statement in 4861 that says that. Per 4861, M=1 means "DHCPv6 is available", not "nodes should do DHCPv6". Relevant text: >> >> M 1-bit "Managed address configuration" flag. When >> set, it indicates that addresses are available via >> Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol [DHCPv6] > > I agree. It’s always just been a hint, no more, no less. And it’s been discussed many times... > As shepherding AD, I believe the consensus is that there is not a need to have this document update RFC 4861/4862. Regards, Brian
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature