Gorry,
Thank you for sending your comments, I have tried to make changes that
incorporate comments from the various area reviews, and expect to shortly
release an ID revision (12) that has these improvements. Details of the
points addressed are below.
I’m glad to help. I noticed one new typo in your response, which may only be in your email, but may be in the new text as well.
Page 12, discussion of "In-Band" near the bottom of the page: This
paragraph implies that an in-band control method will always provide
fate-sharing of the control and regular traffic. It may provide
fate-sharing, but that is by no means assured. For example, the network may
be using ECMP, or traffic tunnels for data but not control traffic.
-GF: Added: “This fate-sharing property is weaker when some or all of the
measured traffic is sent using a path that differs from the path taken by
the control traffic (e.g., where traffic follows a different path de to
use of equal-cost multipath routing, traffic engineering, or tunnels for
specific types of traffic). ”
Change “path de to” to “path due to”.
Cheers,
Andy