Hi Brian, RFC1475 is already obsoleted. The status change asks also to deallocate IP version 7. I support this status change. Cheers, Med > -----Message d'origine----- > De : ietf [mailto:ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx] De la part de Brian E Carpenter > Envoyé : vendredi 18 mars 2016 03:55 > À : ietf@xxxxxxxx > Objet : Re: Last Call: <status-change-ip-versions-5-8-9-to-historic- > 01.txt> (Moving IP versions 5, 8, and 9 to Historic) to Historic > > After some private email from Scott: > > The registry also assigns 7 to TP/IX, which became CATNIP. > > So 7 also needs to be changed to Reserved and RFC1707 and RFC1475 > both need to become Historic. > > http://www.iana.org/assignments/version-numbers/version- > numbers.xhtml#version-numbers-1 > > Brian > > On 18/03/2016 09:13, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > > If we are doing this, then I think that CATNIP (RFC1707) needs to be > made > > Historic at the same time, even though it didn't need an IP version > number. > > > > I also recall rumours that some people were actually using ST2 at one > point. > > Are we sure that it's totally gone away? > > > > Regards > > Brian Carpenter > > > > On 18/03/2016 08:15, The IESG wrote: > >> > >> The IESG has received a request from the Internet Engineering Steering > >> Group IETF (iesg) to consider the following document: > >> - 'Moving IP versions 5, 8, and 9 to Historic' > >> <status-change-ip-versions-5-8-9-to-historic-01.txt> as Historic > >> > >> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits > >> final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the > >> ietf@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2016-04-14. Exceptionally, comments may > be > >> sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the > >> beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. > >> > >> The file can be obtained via > >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-ip-versions-5-8-9-to- > historic/ > >> > >> IESG discussion can be tracked via > >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-ip-versions-5-8-9-to- > historic/ballot/ > >> > >> > >> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. > >> > >> > >>