Will do. -- Joe Hildebrand On 2/25/16, 5:27 AM, "IAB on behalf of Bradner, Scott" <iab-bounces@xxxxxxx on behalf of sob@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >re section 3.5 mid-term vacancies > >please hold off on this particular section for a bit - I am in the middle of proposing some changes >to the ISOC bylaws - mostly to clear up some confusions - and one of these changes concerns IETF vacancy appointments > >the current bylaws do not limit when the IETF can appoint someone to fill a vacancy but do limit when such an >appointment can take office to the start of the ISOC mid year meeting, when all new trustees take office - which might >be a bit frustrating to the appointee > >I am proposing a bylaws update that will put the IETF appointment t fill a vacancy to be the same >as it is for the chapters & org members - with until the next appointment cycle (to do otherwise >provided unequal treatment for the IETF) > >in any case some change is needed to clarify the existing situation > >Scott > >> On Feb 24, 2016, at 12:59 PM, IAB Executive Administrative Manager <execd@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> This is an announcement of an IETF-wide Call for Comment on >> draft-iab-rfc3677bis-00. >> >> The document is being considered for publication as a Best Current >> Practice RFC within the IAB stream, and is available for inspection >> here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-iab-rfc3677bis/ >> >> The Call for Comment will last until 2016-03-23. Please send comments to >> architecture-discuss@xxxxxxxx and iab@xxxxxxx. >> >> >> Abstract >> >> This memo, which obsoletes RFC3677, outlines the process by which the >> IETF makes a selection of an Internet Society (ISOC) Board of >> Trustees appointment. >> >