Re: Required doc sections (Re: [saag] Next step on web phishing draft(draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt))

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ned Freed wrote:
>> For the record, things like IANA considerations sections should be
>> required of I-Ds, even if to say that there aren't any.  A single such
>> section gathering several such sub-sections should do ("Misc
>> Considerations.  This draft has no IANA considerations.  This draft has
>> no ...").
> 
> I have already explained why I think this is a Very Bad Idea.

Agreed. In my experience, the IANA does not want the I-D to contain a
section entitled "IANA Considerations" if there are no actions required
of the IANA.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]