> For the record, things like IANA considerations sections should be
> required of I-Ds, even if to say that there aren't any. A single such
> section gathering several such sub-sections should do ("Misc
> Considerations. This draft has no IANA considerations. This draft has
> no ...").
I have already explained why I think this is a Very Bad Idea.
> And some such sections might be removed by the RFC Editor, or
> not (e.g., remove IANA considerations sections that say there are no
> IANA considerations).
This I agree with - it is up to the RFC Editor to determine what's appropriate
to have in the final document.
Ned
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf