Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > Thomas Narten wrote: >>> Agreed. In my experience, the IANA does not want the I-D to contain a >>> section entitled "IANA Considerations" if there are no actions required >>> of the IANA. >> Your experience does not match what IANA has stated numerous >> times. Please see section 6.1 of >> draft-narten-iana-considerations-rfc2434bis-07.txt, which contains >> text that IANA has a large part in crafting. > > By "my experience" I mean for example RFC 3922; during Auth48 or > thereabouts I was told that the IANA didn't want the document to include > an "IANA Considerations" section since there were no actions required of > the IANA. But perhaps that was a miscommunication. Oh, and for what it's worth I agree with the policy of requiring an "IANA Considerations" section even if there are no actions required of the IANA, since I think it is best to be explicit about such matters. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf