Re: RFC 1345 mnemonics table not consistent with Unicode 3.2.0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



[People, again, please don't send me copies of messages to the list.]

Lisa Dusseault <lisa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> For the guidelines on doing a new draft, please read http://
> www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-guidelines.html.
> 
> Another place you might start discussion of similar work is on the
> Apps Discuss list -- https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Thanks very much for the useful pointers.

> If the IETF were to consider something like RFC1345 today, there
> would be a lot of questions like [...]

Yes, those need to be addressed, and thank you for raising them.

Okay, that's it for this thread I suppose; if anything further is to
happen, I (or someone else) need to raise a new draft. Thanks again
to everyone who contributed to my understanding.

-- 
 \       "Holy contributing to the delinquency of minors, Batman!"  -- |
  `\                                                             Robin |
_o__)                                                                  |
Ben Finney


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]