Mark Andrews wrote:
>> On Sep 13, 2007, at 12:05 AM, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino wrote:
>>
>>>> I believe that a more constructive assessment is that enterprises are
>>>> unwilling to pay non-trivial costs to renumber, and ISPs are
>>>> unwilling to pay non-trivial costs to support a non-scalable routing
>>>> subsystem.
>>> my persistent question to the enterprise operator is this:
>>> how frequently do you plan to switch your isp, or how many times
>>> did you do that in the past?
>> That's actually irrelevant. Regardless of the real answer,
>> enterprises are not willing to buy into vendor lock.
> Except there really is no vendor lock anymore. It is
> possible to automate the entire renumbering process. If
> there are spots where it is not automated then they should
> be found and fixed.
Oh man, that's rich. Do you actually believe that?
I think you forgot to set your alarm clock and are living in that dream
world that I mentioned previously.
--
Jeff McAdams
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a
little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-- Benjamin Franklin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf