> > because, in the end, ULA (whichever flavor it is) leads to > > IPv6-to-IPv6 NAT. > > I prefer losing some bytes in all my packets between locations using > different ULA-D prefixes to get an underlying VPN / tunneling > infrastructure. This allows me to keep things flat, i.e. pure routing. > > itojun, let's just stop using the 3 letters word. It does not exist > anymore. is it ULA, NAT, VPN or all of them :-) itojun _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf