On 9/13/07, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino <itojun@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > http://sa.vix.com/~vixie/ula-global.txt has my thoughts on this, which > > > i've appropriated without permission from hinden, huston, and narten > > > and inaccurately failed to remove their names from (since none of them > > > supports the proposal). in fact, nobody in the ietf intelligensia > > > supports the proposal. the showstopped is that this appears to many as > > > an end-run around PI, and the fear is that there's no way to prevent it > > because, in the end, ULA (whichever flavor it is) leads to IPv6-to-IPv6 > NAT. did you read the thread some months ago? There was mention ID and LOC splitting. ULA fits that idea almost perfect. -- Roger Jorgensen | rogerj@xxxxxxxxx | - IPv6 is The Key! http://www.jorgensen.no | roger@xxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf