> > http://sa.vix.com/~vixie/ula-global.txt has my thoughts on this, which > > i've appropriated without permission from hinden, huston, and narten > > and inaccurately failed to remove their names from (since none of them > > supports the proposal). in fact, nobody in the ietf intelligensia > > supports the proposal. the showstopped is that this appears to many as > > an end-run around PI, and the fear is that there's no way to prevent it because, in the end, ULA (whichever flavor it is) leads to IPv6-to-IPv6 NAT. itojun _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf