Re: RFC 1345 mnemonics table not consistent with Unicode 3.2.0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> I'm a bit unclear on what these resources are in this volunteer organization
> that we have that can be focused on tasks as needed. But hey, if we have them,
> then I'm all for using them on the really critical stuff.
well, I _wish_ we could focus resources on some critical areas.  it
doesn't seem like we have a shortage of critical work to do.

I don't have an inherent objection to people working on a revision to
1345, or to IETF publishing it, as long as there are enough people and
sufficient expertise to do it competently.   at the same time I
recognize that IESG and the RFC editor have finite resources, and that
it is sometimes prudent for them to limit their organizations' commitments.

Keith


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]