Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 18-sep-2007, at 18:10, Ted Hardie wrote:

The people that are fighting having ULA-C are the same ones that don't want PI, and they are trying to force ULA-C == PI so they can turn that argument around and say 'we told you PI was a bad idea' when there is no way to
filter out what would have been ULA-C.

I am totally against ULA-C, and I am not against PI, so please re- examine
that statement.

I'm in favor of ULA-C and against the current IPv6 PI policies, so it seems the statement indeed doesn't universally apply...

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]