<<Sorry for the top-posting...>> First of all, thank you for your reply... From the presentation I understand that I should 'convince' the WG first (page 14). Since a WG for HTTP does not exist and I've already talked to the http-wg mailing list, should I follow the suggested 'Individuals->WG->IETF->IESG' path and ask this list? Also, I believe that I've already seen most of the things that the presenations shows in BCP9 and the other docs I've read. Did I miss something? On Sunday 02 September 2007, xupeili 18916 wrote: > Hi, Stefanos > > There is an excellent tutorial on how to bring new work to the IETF here: > > http://edu.ietf.org/node/view/69 > > Peili > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Stefanos Harhalakis <v13@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Monday, September 3, 2007 0:09 am > Subject: What to do next? > > > Hello there, > > > > I've wrote and submitted a draft [1]. I've also asked for > > feedback at the > > http-wg mailing list. I believe that there is no more feedback > > coming from > > the http-wg list and I'd like an advice on what to do next. (The > > draft > > describes a method for HTTP to support on-demand headers) > > > > Should I ask browser developers for more feedback? Should I try > > to implement > > this? Something tells me that I should not submit it to IESG yet. > > I've read > > RFC and I-D guidelines and BCP9, but I'm still not sure what to do. > > > > All advices will be greatly appreciated... > > > > Best regards, > > Harhalakis Stefanos > > > > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/draft-sharhalakis-httphreq/ > > (2nd > > version is submitted and should be visible soon) > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Ietf mailing list > > Ietf@xxxxxxxx > > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf