Re: why can't IETF emulate IEEE on this point?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Were it that easy.

An IEEE LoA can be RAND, can be RANDZ, or can state that the company
won't RAND nor RANDZ.

On 9/25/07, Paul Vixie <paul@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> in <http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/09/21/802_11n_patent_threat/>, we see:
>
>                 Letters of Assurance are requested from all parties
>                 holding patents which may be applicable to any IEEE
>                 standard. Basically they state that the patent owner
>                 won't sue anyone for implementing the standard.  ...
>
> i was thinking, what a great policy.  why doesn't IETF have one like it?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@xxxxxxxx
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
>


-- 
Clint (JOATMON) Chaplin
Principal Engineer
Corporate Standardization (US)
SISA

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]