> Without going into debate about consenting adults, and while I might > disagree with Paul in certain fine points, I'd suggest that we consider the > ULA-G proposal within the IETF and ask that Paul submit it as an I-D. ULA-G > could have broad application if in fact we solve the multihoming problem > (IMHO) and I'd like to be the optimist and say that we can do that. i'll need new coauthors. i ain't signing up for this alone, and the authors of ULA-C only wrote it up so that we would all know what ideas had been abandoned, not as a way forward. _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf