Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Bill,

On Sep 14, 2007, at 2:15 AM, Bill Manning wrote:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 05:29:39PM -0700, Tony Hain wrote:
IPv6 _is_ IPv4 with more bits and it is being deployed that way.
beating this dead horse...

The official IETF state sport.

actually, David is profoundly wrong.

Frequently.

IPv6 is an entirely new address family - it has erie similarities to IPv4, but is not backward compatable.

The "with more bits" part wasn't an offhand comment.

Regards,
-drc


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]