-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
>>>>> "Stephane" == Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@xxxxxx> writes:
>> (ARIN has suggested that I might consider site-local addresses)
Stephane> Are you sure there was not a misunderstanding? As you say,
Stephane> site-local addresses are deprecated but may be ARIN wanted
Stephane> you to use Unique Local Addresses (RFC 4193), which
Stephane> *seems* a good solution for your problem?
That may be the case.
I will ask them.
I was not aware of Unique Local Addresses, RFC4193. I will consider
them. Getting the reverse names configured correctly everywhere is a
pain, since I had to make sure that I've gotten all the recursive name
servers configured as secondaries for the prefix that I choose, but a
reverse name lookup failure is not the end of the world.
- --
] Bear: "Me, I'm just the shape of a bear." | firewalls [
] Michael Richardson, Xelerance Corporation, Ottawa, ON |net architect[
] mcr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/mcr/ |device driver[
] panic("Just another Debian GNU/Linux using, kernel hacking, security guy"); [
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Finger me for keys
iQEVAwUBRugeK4CLcPvd0N1lAQIHrQgAmopDlhTEB9fdbbldVddTQQA42Ld6Xbux
y1isKzLaiNXGNU1rQC+fRDPIw0n2HSbFfwBsr+xBTGBO1JPLj6HwQUTjBQUkmhgl
SZsxcKv1EmjTbMaj7oacWxGZr5kbH2eiNvRhqxL7k04hR6s8oQY5rjL9ZU3QDnLP
DT71NeDE9kanJquT+PAtGMLHZKRy+Ejx6Cl3qqZbLSz9w3agpnq6DTy1ul45ifJf
bN6peAJDBRJNBNgYf/6cBU9gT04zWNRlcIXnTM6mIi+/7cPcDH92YX4L1wSMGKxZ
heeVUnKLqOsb3lceMeb4vtQAQuBTOu5ywrGozwPtMqZNMwg8IsjJiw==
=VUQd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf