Re: [Ietf-http-auth] Re: Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 01:52:00PM -0500, Nicolas Williams wrote:
> But this draft does have a formal _state_: "IESG Evaluation :: Revised
> ID Needed."

It's state seems to be that it has not exactly failed IETF LC (e.g., one
IESG member commented that "[i]t is my educated guess there is rough
consensus in the IETF to publish this document.  However, additional
work to document that roughconsensus would be helpful given the strength
of the two last call objections."  Which proves nothing, except that the
process is such that the sponsoring AD and the IESG as a whole are
responsible for calling the result of the IETF LC and for insisting on
whatever changes are needed for IETF LC comments to be addressed that
have to be addressed.  Once the IESG makes a decision one can appeal.

Nico
-- 

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]