RE: A pattented standard is not a standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

On Sat, 2007-10-27 at 13:11 -0400, Joel M. Halpern wrote:
> I actually strongly prefer reading top-postings.
> More important content below, as a courtesy since you seem to prefer 
> postings in-line...
> 
> At 12:50 PM 10/27/2007, you wrote:
> >Dear Mr. Hallam-Baker,
> >
> >On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 11:35 -0700, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
> > > Is this an official FSF campaign?
> > >
> > > My past experience is ...
> >[...snip...]
> >
> >Hello,
> >
> >And please, you should be done bottom-posting. You may have a look
> ><URL:http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html>. If you have another
> >opinions, give me mail without any hesitancy.
> 
> The important issue is that the IETF, and the IETF mailing lists, do 
> not have a policy on this matter.  Therefore, it is up to the 
> individual posters how they choose to post, and it is quite 
> inappropriate to complain about the style another person 
> chooses.  The issue of posting placement is an issue on which 
> reasonable people can and do differ.

Okay i see. Never mind about that. Nevertheless, i will personally keep
bottom-posting up. 

Sincerely, 

-- 
"I'll make him an offer he can't refuse."
		-- Michael Corleone, "Chapter 27", page 382

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]