RE: A pattented standard is not a standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Is this an official FSF campaign?

My past experience is that RMS begins these campaigns before bothering to find out what the actual issues are. If RMS wants to influence the debate then he should join the debate here.

I am not very interested in RMS's opinion on a set of claims he has heard second hand from one supporter which he then relays third hand through other supporters.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: J. Pablo Fernández [mailto:pupeno@xxxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 7:48 PM
> To: ietf@xxxxxxxx
> Subject: A pattented standard is not a standard
> 
> Hello,
> 
> The idea of an standard is to make communication possible and 
> easy. A pattented standard is a call for chaos or a tax on 
> communication. I'm very much with the FSF in opposing TLS-authz.
> 
> Thank you.
> --
> J. Pablo Fernández <pupeno@xxxxxxxxxx> (http://pupeno.com)
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@xxxxxxxx
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
> 
_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]