Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Not viewed from the socket programmer's point of view.
> Look at how an AF_INET6 socket behaves when given
> an address like ::FFFF:192.0.2.3
> afaik the behavior is then exactly what you describe.
> Whether the stacks are independent code modules or
> alternate paths through the same code is irrelevant
> to the externally observed behavior.

	see draft-ietf-v6ops-security-overview-06.txt section 2.2.

itojun

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]