> The IESG is considering approving this draft as an experimental > track RFC with knowledge of the IPR disclosure from Redphone > Security. The IESG solicits final comments on whether the IETF > community has consensus to publish draft-housley-tls-authz-extns as > an experimental standard given the IPR claimed. <not wearing any hats> Basically repeating the comments I made earlier: I think this document is somewhat useful, and whatever you may think about IPRs, basically nobody has claimed that the technical solution is flawed (except one minor detail, easily solved by an RFC editor note -- see below) or undesirable. However, since there doesn't seem to be widespread support for this draft, an Experimental RFC seems like the most appropriate forward (since Experimental does not need to represent IETF community consensus or recommendation). The minor detail that should be fixed (as was pointed out by others) is changing the length fields from 16 bits to 24 bits (the rest of TLS already uses 24-bit length fields for certificates). Best regards, Pasi _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf