Re: Comments on draft-aboba-sg-experiment-03.txt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Eliot,

>> I have one additional concern about this proposal.  If a study group is
>> intended to meet at an IETF, it will compete with slot requests both
>> from IETF working groups and IRTF research groups.  I wouldn't want to
>> prohibit f2fs but I would certainly suggest that they come in low on the
>> totem pole for space requests.

Yes.

I think I'd prefer to make the decision about having capacity for new
officially recognized efforts (BOFs, SGs, WGs) at time that we're accepting
these efforts. For instance, on my half of the area, I'd like have no more
groups than what I can personally attend, without being in two or more
places at the same time.

(But lets not de-prioritize SGs (or BOFs) out of the meeting completely.
The point of an official effort is that it gets attention, resources, etc;
A judgment call by the AD/IESG/IAB/community that this attention
is deserved in this particular case.)

Jari



_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]