IETF Discussion

• Thread Index

• Re: [saag] Minor addition to draft-williams-on-channel-binding; one week to respond
  • From: Jeffrey Hutzelman
• Re: [PMOL] Re: A question about [Fwd: WG Review: Performance Metrics atOther Layers (pmol)]
  • From: Sam Hartman
• RE: Patents can be for good, not only evil
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Patents can be for good, not only evil
  • From: Scott Brim
• RE: [PMOL] Re: A question about [Fwd: WG Review: PerformanceMetrics atOther Layers (pmol)]
  • From: Dan Schutzer
• RE: [PMOL] Re: A question about [Fwd: WG Review: Performance Metrics atOther Layers (pmol)]
  • From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
• Experimental track (was: Non-participants)
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: About referenced documents...
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: 2026, draft, full, etc.
  • From: Simon Josefsson
• Re: Non-participants [Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz]
  • From: Dan Riley
• Re: About referenced documents...
  • From: Randy Presuhn
• Re: About referenced documents...
  • From: Tom Yu
• Re: About referenced documents...
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: About referenced documents...
  • From: lconroy
• secdir review of draft-ietf-v6ops-scanning-implications-03
  • From: Jeffrey Hutzelman
• Re: About referenced documents...
  • From: Andrew G. Malis
• Re: About referenced documents...
  • From: Tom Yu
• RE: Patents can be for good, not only evil
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Patents can be for good, not only evil
  • From: Steven M. Bellovin
• Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-xcon-framework (A Framework for Centralized Conferencing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: SM
• RE: Patents can be for good, not only evil
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Dr. JunIchiro 'Itojun' Hagino
  • From: Jun Murai
• Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-xcon-framework (A Framework for Centralized Conferencing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: 2026, draft, full, etc.
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: Non-participants
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• RE: Patents can be for good, not only evil
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: 2026, draft, full, etc.
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: 2026, draft, full, etc.
  • From: Ned Freed
• Re: Non-participants [Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz]
  • From: Ned Freed
• Re: 2026, draft, full, etc.
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: 2026, draft, full, etc.
  • From: Peter Saint-Andre
• Re: Oppose draft-carpenter-ipr-patent-frswds-00
  • From: James M. Polk
• Re: 2026, draft, full, etc.
  • From: James M. Polk
• Re: Oppose draft-carpenter-ipr-patent-frswds-00
  • From: James M. Polk
• Re: Patents can be for good, not only evil
  • From: peter_blatherwick
• Re: Patents can be for good, not only evil
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Non-participants [Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz]
  • From: Andrew Newton
• RE: Patents can be for good, not only evil
  • From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand
• RE: 2026, draft, full, etc.
  • From: michael.dillon
• RE: Patents can be for good, not only evil
  • From: Yaakov Stein
• RE: Patents can be for good, not only evil
  • From: Yaakov Stein
• Re: Patents can be for good, not only evil
  • From: Eric Burger
• Re: 2026, draft, full, etc.
  • From: Dave Cridland
• 2026, draft, full, etc.
  • From: Eliot Lear
• RE: Patents can be for good, not only evil
  • From: michael.dillon
• Re: Oppose draft-carpenter-ipr-patent-frswds-00
  • From: Simon Josefsson
• RE: Patents can be for good, not only evil
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: Patents can be for good, not only evil
  • From: Steven M. Bellovin
• Re: Patents can be for good, not only evil
  • From: Byung-Hee HWANG
• Re: A question about [Fwd: WG Review: Performance Metrics at Other Layers (pmol)]
  • From: Yangwoo Ko
• Re: Patents can be for good, not only evil
  • From: Dave Crocker
• RE: Patents can be for good, not only evil
  • From: Lawrence Rosen
• Re: Patents can be for good, not only evil
  • From: Peter Dambier
• Re: Patents can be for good, not only evil
  • From: Steven M. Bellovin
• Re: Oppose draft-carpenter-ipr-patent-frswds-00
  • From: James M. Polk
• RE: Patents can be for good, not only evil
  • From: Lawrence Rosen
• Re: Oppose draft-carpenter-ipr-patent-frswds-00
  • From: Simon Josefsson
• Patents can be for good, not only evil
  • From: Eric Burger
• RE: Oppose draft-carpenter-ipr-patent-frswds-00
  • From: Eric Burger
• Re: A question about [Fwd: WG Review: Performance Metrics at Other Layers (pmol)]
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: Oppose draft-carpenter-ipr-patent-frswds-00
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• A question about [Fwd: WG Review: Performance Metrics at Other Layers (pmol)]
  • From: Leslie Daigle
• Re: When is using patented technology appropriate?
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Oppose draft-carpenter-ipr-patent-frswds-00
  • From: Henning Schulzrinne
• RE: When is using patented technology appropriate?
  • From: Lawrence Rosen
• Oppose draft-carpenter-ipr-patent-frswds-00
  • From: James M. Polk
• Re: Nominet position paper about Signing the Root.
  • From: Thierry Moreau
• Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz
  • From: Bob Braden
• Nominet position paper about Signing the Root.
  • From: Roy Arends
• Minor addition to draft-williams-on-channel-binding; one week to respond
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz
  • From: Sam Hartman
• RE: Silly TLS Auth lobbying
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz
  • From: Bill Sommerfeld
• Re: rejection of patents and standards
  • From: Eric Burger
• Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz
  • From: Eric Rosen
• Re: Silly TLS Auth lobbying
  • From: Simon Josefsson
• Re: Free? Software Foundation
  • From: Scott O. Bradner
• Re: Free? Software Foundation
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• Re: Free? Software Foundation
  • From: Scott O. Bradner
• Re: Free? Software Foundation
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Free? Software Foundation
  • From: Scott O. Bradner
• Re: Please oppose patent-encumbered technologies, including draft-housley-tls-authz-extns
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: Silly TLS Auth lobbying
  • From: Sam Hartman
• RE: Silly TLS Auth lobbying
  • From: michael.dillon
• Re: Silly TLS Auth lobbying
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz
  • From: Ben Finney
• Please oppose patent-encumbered technologies, including draft-housley-tls-authz-extns
  • From: Ben Finney
• Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz
  • From: Ben Finney
• Silly TLS Auth lobbying
  • From: RJ Atkinson
• Re: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-avt-rtp-vorbis-06
  • From: Luca Barbato
• Re: About referenced documents...
  • From: Randy Presuhn
• About referenced documents...
  • From: lconroy
• Re: Musical commentary from the RIPE meeting
  • From: Marc Manthey
• Re: Musical commentary from the RIPE meeting
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Non-participants [Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz]
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz
  • From: Bill Fenner
• RE: Musical commentary from the RIPE meeting
  • From: Gordon.Lennox
• RE: Musical commentary from the RIPE meeting
  • From: Ole Jacobsen
• RE: Musical commentary from the RIPE meeting
  • From: David B. Nelson
• Re: Musical commentary from the RIPE meeting
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Musical commentary from the RIPE meeting
  • From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand
• Re: Non-participants [Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz]
  • From: Bill Manning
• Re: Please reject proprietary standards.
  • From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand
• Non-participants [Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz]
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz
  • From: Rob Evans
• Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz
  • From: Andrew Newton
• RE: A pattented standard is not a standard
  • From: Byung-Hee HWANG
• RE: A pattented standard is not a standard
  • From: Byung-Hee HWANG
• Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz
  • From: David Morris
• Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz
  • From: Andrew Newton
• Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz
  • From: Andrew Newton
• Re: DOS
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• Re: Megatron
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz
  • From: James Seng
• RE: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz
  • From: David Harrington
• Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz
  • From: Stjepan Gros
• Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz
  • From: Ben Finney
• Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz
  • From: David Morris
• Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz
  • From: Ben Finney
• Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz
  • From: Ben Finney
• Re: Megatron
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• RE: DOS (was: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz)
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz
  • From: Bernard Aboba
• Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz
  • From: Bernard Aboba
• Re: A priori IPR choices
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz
  • From: Brian Dickson
• Re: A pattented standard is not a standard
  • From: Bill Fenner
• Re: Megatron
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz
  • From: Bernard Aboba
• DOS (was: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz)
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-avt-rtp-vorbis-06
  • From: Spencer Dawkins
• Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz
  • From: Ned Freed
• RE: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz
  • From: Scott Kitterman
• Megatron (was: TLS-authz)
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Experimental makes sense for tls-authz
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• Re: A priori IPR choices
  • From: SM
• RE: A pattented standard is not a standard
  • From: Scott Brim
• RE: A pattented standard is not a standard
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: A priori IPR choices
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz
  • From: Melinda Shore
• RE: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz
  • From: Powers Chuck-RXCP20
• Experimental makes sense for tls-authz
  • From: Randy Presuhn
• RE: A priori IPR choices
  • From: Scott Brim
• Opposition to accepting TLS-authz an experimental standard
  • From: Richard Hartmann
• RE: A priori IPR choices
  • From: Philippe Verdy
• I oppose making TLS-authz an experimental standard
  • From: Sven Lilienthal
• Call for IAOC Nominations and Volunteers
  • From: The IESG
• Please reject proprietary standards.
  • From: Ismael Jones
• Re: An example of what is wrong with the IETF's IPv6 documentation
  • From: Mark Smith
• A pattented standard is not a standard
  • From: J. Pablo Fernández
• TLS-authz "experimental" standard
  • From: Richard Wilbur
• rejection of patents and standards
  • From: Karl Berry
• We oppose TLS-authz "experimental" standard
  • From: Reinhard Moosauer
• (no subject)
  • From: rdroms
• TLS-authz standard
  • From: Martin Jürgens
• TLS-authz "experimental" standard
  • From: Christoph Resch
• NO to TLS-authz
  • From: Chuck Burgess
• TLS-authz
  • From: Benj. Mako Hill
• draft-housley-tls-authz-extns
  • From: Robert Kelly
• Re: secdir review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-mpls-02.txt
  • From: Bob Briscoe
• Re: Last Call: draft-levin-mmusic-xml-media-control (XML Schema for Media Control) to Informational RFC
  • From: Pete Cordell
• opposing TLS-authz "experimental"
  • From: Bruno Delcourt
• Opposing making TLS-authz an experimental standard
  • From: Dev at weitling
• Opposing making TLS-authz an experimental standard
  • From: Darko Ivancan
• Comment on draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt
  • From: "Martin v. Löwis"
• RE: Last Call: draft-levin-mmusic-xml-media-control (XML Schema for Media Control) to Informational RFC
  • From: Even, Roni
• FSF opposes making TLS-authz an experimental standard
  • From: John Sullivan
• Please reject draft-housley-tls-authz-extns
  • From: Toni Mueller
• TLS Authorization
  • From: Ringo Kamens
• TLS Authorisation
  • From: Willy Weisz
• patented standards that go along with TLS-authz
  • From: Walter Bender
• We oppose TLS-authz.
  • From: Jo
• Comment on TLS authorization
  • From: Bernhard Damberger
• TLS-authz standardization
  • From: Jan.Haul
• TLS-authz
  • From: Joshua N Pritikin
• TLS Auth
  • From: Benjamin Gretsch
• TLS Authorization
  • From: Bryan Quigley
• No bad TLS authorization standards
  • From: Jeffrey Hankins
• TLS Authorization Extensions
  • From: Matthew Flaschen
• Re: Please reject draft-housley-tls-authz-extns (supplementary note)
  • From: Toni Mueller
• draft-housley-tls-authz-extns
  • From: Andreas Huennebeck
• please REJECT tls-authz until it is patent-free!
  • From: Chris MacGregor
• comment opposing TLS-authz "experimental"
  • From: Diez B. Roggisch
• I oppose the publication of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns as an experimental standard.
  • From: Michel Debar
• TLS Auth
  • From: Eike Lange
• Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-unicode-escapes (ASCII Escaping ofUnicode Characters) to BCP
  • From: Peter Constable
• FIfF opposes making TLS-authz an experimental standard
  • From: Jakob Schröter
• Concerns on TLS authorization extensions
  • From: John Wyatt
• Experimental TLS Authorization Standard
  • From: Craig, David
• Re: A priori IPR choices
  • From: Spencer Dawkins
• RE: A priori IPR choices
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: A priori IPR choices
  • From: Norbert Bollow
• Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
  • From: Byung-Hee HWANG
• Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
  • From: Byung-Hee HWANG
• Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
  • From: Thomas Narten
• Re: A priori IPR choices
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: When is using patented technology appropriate?
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: A priori IPR choices
  • From: Theodore Tso
• Re: Offer of time on the IPR WG agenda for rechartering
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: Offer of time on the IPR WG agenda for rechartering
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: Offer of time on the IPR WG agenda for rechartering
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: IETF 70 - meeting conflict - any way to juggle schedule to accommodate?
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: A priori IPR choices
  • From: David Morris
• Re: A priori IPR choices
  • From: Norbert Bollow
• IETF 70 - meeting conflict - any way to juggle schedule to accommodate?
  • From: Brian Dickson
• Re: A priori IPR choices
  • From: Theodore Tso
• Re: A priori IPR choices
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: A priori IPR choices
  • From: Scott Kitterman
• Re: A priori IPR choices
  • From: Norbert Bollow
• Re: A priori IPR choices
  • From: Theodore Tso
• RE: Offer of time on the IPR WG agenda for rechartering
  • From: Lawrence Rosen
• RE: Last Call: draft-levin-mmusic-xml-media-control (XML Schema for Media Control) to Informational RFC
  • From: Even, Roni
• Offer of time on the IPR WG agenda for rechartering
  • From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand
• Re: A priori IPR choices
  • From: Simon Josefsson
• RE: When is using patented technology appropriate?
  • From: Lawrence Rosen
• Re: A priori IPR choices
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: When is using patented technology appropriate?
  • From: Steven M. Bellovin
• Re: When is using patented technology appropriate?
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: A priori IPR choices
  • From: Norbert Bollow
• Re: A priori IPR choices
  • From: Norbert Bollow
• RE: A priori IPR choices
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: A priori IPR choices
  • From: Ted Hardie
• RE: A priori IPR choices
  • From: Tony Finch
• Re: A priori IPR choices
  • From: Scott Kitterman
• RE: FYI 28 (was: A priori IPR choices)
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: A priori IPR choices
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: A priori IPR choices
  • From: Lawrence Rosen
• Re: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third LastCall:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns]
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: A priori IPR choices
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: A priori IPR choices
  • From: Scott Kitterman
• Re: When is using patented technology appropriate?
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: When is using patented technology appropriate?
  • From: Tony Finch
• RE: Last Call: draft-ietf-psamp-framework (A Framework for Packet Selection and Reporting) to Informational RFC
  • From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
• Re: secdir review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-mpls-02.txt
  • From: Lars Eggert
• Re: A priori IPR choices
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• FYI 28 (was: A priori IPR choices)
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: A priori IPR choices
  • From: Norbert Bollow
• Re: When is using patented technology appropriate?
  • From: Simon Josefsson
• Re: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third LastCall:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns]
  • From: Theodore Tso
• Re: A priori IPR choices
  • From: Lawrence Rosen
• Re: A priori IPR choices
  • From: Scott Kitterman
• Re: A priori IPR choices
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third LastCall:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns]
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: When is using patented technology appropriate?
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns]
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: When is using patented technology appropriate?
  • From: Ted Hardie
• RE: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third LastCall:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns]
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns]
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns]
  • From: Ted Hardie
• RE: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third LastCall:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns]
  • From: Ted Hardie
• When is using patented technology appropriate?
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third LastCall:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns]
  • From: Sam Hartman
• RE: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third LastCall:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns]
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns]
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Lightening talks at the plenary
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: A priori IPR choices
  • From: Lawrence Rosen
• Re: A priori IPR choices
  • From: Norbert Bollow
• Re: A priori IPR choices
  • From: Theodore Tso
• Re: A priori IPR choices
  • From: stephen . farrell
• Re: A priori IPR choices
  • From: Simon Josefsson
• Re: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns]
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: A priori IPR choices
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: A priori IPR choices
  • From: Steven M. Bellovin
• Re: A priori IPR choices
  • From: Theodore Tso
• Re: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns]
  • From: Scott Brim
• Re: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns]
  • From: Simon Josefsson
• Re: A priori IPR choices
  • From: Simon Josefsson
• Re: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns]
  • From: Norbert Bollow
• Re: An example of what is wrong with the IETF's IPv6 documentation
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: An example of what is wrong with the IETF's IPv6 documentation
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: A priori IPR choices
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• RE: An example of what is wrong with the IETF's IPv6 documentation
  • From: michael.dillon
• Re: An example of what is wrong with the IETF's IPv6 documentation
  • From: David Conrad
• Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-avt-topologies-06.txt
  • From: Magnus Westerlund
• Re: Seeking ICANN Nomcom 2008 candidate
  • From: Joe Abley
• Re: secdir review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-mpls-02.txt
  • From: Tom Yu
• An example of what is wrong with the IETF's IPv6 documentation
  • From: michael.dillon
• Re: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns]
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns]
  • From: Henning Schulzrinne
• Re: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns]
  • From: Scott Kitterman
• Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-avt-topologies-06.txt
  • From: Suresh Krishnan
• Re: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns]
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns]
  • From: John C Klensin
• RE: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns]
  • From: Lawrence Rosen
• Re: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns]
  • From: Norbert Bollow
• RE: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns]
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Third Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Third Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns
  • From: Sam Hartman
• RE: Last Call: draft-klensin-unicode-escapes (ASCII Escaping ofUnicode Characters) to BCP
  • From: Peter Constable
• Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-unicode-escapes (ASCII Escaping ofUnicode Characters) to BCP
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-unicode-escapes (ASCII Escaping ofUnicode Characters) to BCP
  • From: Peter Constable
• RE: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns]
  • From: David Morris
• Re: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns]
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-unicode-escapes (ASCII Escaping ofUnicode Characters) to BCP
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• RE: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third LastCall:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns]
  • From: David Harrington
• RE: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third LastCall:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns]
  • From: David Harrington
• Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-unicode-escapes (ASCII Escaping of Unicode Characters) to BCP
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• RE: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns]
  • From: Lawrence Rosen
• Re: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns]
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• RE: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns]
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns]
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns]
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• RE: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns]
  • From: Ted Hardie
• RE: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns]
  • From: Lawrence Rosen
• RE: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns]
  • From: Ted Hardie
• RE: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns]
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns]
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• RE: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns]
  • From: Lawrence Rosen
• Re: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns]
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• RE: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns]
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns]
  • From: Thomas Narten
• Re: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns]
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns]
  • From: Paul Hoffman
• RE: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns]
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns]
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns]
  • From: Simon Josefsson
• Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
  • From: Thomas Narten
• secdir review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-mpls-02.txt
  • From: Tom Yu
• RE: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns]
  • From: Paul Hoffman
• Re: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns]
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• RE: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns]
  • From: Lawrence Rosen
• Re: Third Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Third Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns
  • From: Eric Rescorla
• A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns]
  • From: Scott Brim
• A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns]
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Third Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• RE: Third Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Third Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns
  • From: Russ Housley
• Re: Third Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns
  • From: Simon Josefsson
• Gen-art review of draft-ietf-rmt-bb-fec-rs-04.txt
  • From: Elwyn Davies
• review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-nfs-rdma-problem-statement-07.txt
  • From: Sandy Murphy
• Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-sip-answermode-06.txt
  • From: Suresh Krishnan
• FW: ITU-T Recommendations
  • From: Yaakov Stein
• Re: TMDA backscatter
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Host for IETF 73
  • From: Ray Pelletier
• Re: RFC3678: header incompatibility
  • From: Bill Fenner
• Re: [IPsec] Re: Last call comments for draft-lepinski-dh-groups-01
  • From: Chinh Nguyen
• RE: Last Call: draft-levin-mmusic-xml-media-control (XML Schema for Media Control) to Informational RFC
  • From: Even, Roni
• Re: TMDA backscatter
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: RFC3678: header incompatibility
  • From: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
• Re: The IETF duty for Carbon emissions, energy use &ct.
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Re: [Tsvwg] Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-tsvwg-diffserv-class-aggr (Aggregation of DiffServ Service Classes) to Informational RFC
  • From: Magnus Westerlund
• Re: RFC3678: header incompatibility
  • From: Bill Fenner
• Re: The IETF duty for Carbon emissions, energy use &ct.
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Vancouver Host & Sponsor Lineup!
  • From: Ray Pelletier
• Re: RFC3678: header incompatibility
  • From: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
• Re: RFC3678: header incompatibility
  • From: Bill Fenner
• RFC3678: header incompatibility
  • From: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
• Re: The IETF duty for Carbon emissions, energy use &ct.
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: The IETF duty for Carbon emissions, energy use &ct.
  • From: Daniel Senie
• Re: The IETF duty for Carbon emissions, energy use &ct.
  • From: Joel Jaeggli
• RFP: IESG I-D Tracker Pythin Conversion
  • From: Ray Pelletier
• Re: The IETF duty for Carbon emissions, energy use &ct.
  • From: Daniel Senie
• Re: TMDA backscatter
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: The IETF duty for Carbon emissions, energy use &ct.
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: The IETF duty for Carbon emissions, energy use &ct.
  • From: John Leslie
• The IETF duty for Carbon emissions, energy use &ct.
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: TMDA backscatter
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: More comments on draft-aboba-sg-experiment-03.txt
  • From: Hannes Tschofenig
• Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering)
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: More comments on draft-aboba-sg-experiment-03.txt
  • From: Bernard Aboba
• More comments on draft-aboba-sg-experiment-03.txt
  • From: Hannes Tschofenig
• Re: Follow-up work on NAT-PT
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Comments on draft-aboba-sg-experiment-03.txt
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Travel Considerations
  • From: Dave Crocker
• RE: Travel Considerations
  • From: Darryl (Dassa) Lynch
• Re: Travel Considerations
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Travel Considerations
  • From: Dan Harkins
• Re: Travel Considerations
  • From: Marshall Eubanks
• Re: Travel Considerations
  • From: Fred Baker
• Re: Travel Considerations
  • From: Fred Baker
• RE: Travel Considerations
  • From: michael.dillon
• Re: IETF / UN
  • From: Steven M. Bellovin
• Re: Travel Considerations
  • From: Clint Chaplin
• RE: Travel Considerations
  • From: Hadriel Kaplan
• Re: IETF / UN
  • From: Sam Weiler
• Re: Travel Considerations
  • From: Dan Harkins
• Re: IETF / UN
  • From: Matt Larson
• Re: Travel Considerations
  • From: Melinda Shore
• RE: Travel Considerations
  • From: Eric Gray
• IETF / UN
  • From: Eastlake III Donald-LDE008
• Re: Travel Considerations
  • From: James M. Polk
• Re: Travel Considerations
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Travel Considerations
  • From: Dan Harkins
• Re: Travel Considerations
  • From: Marshall Eubanks
• Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering)
  • From: Tony Li
• Re: Travel Considerations
  • From: Eric Burger
• Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering)
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering)
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• Re: Travel Considerations
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Travel Considerations
  • From: Eric Burger
• Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition
  • From: John Curran
• Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering)
  • From: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
• IPv4.6, was: Call for action vs. lost opportunity
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Re: Comments on draft-aboba-sg-experiment-03.txt
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering)
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering)
  • From: Tony Li
• Re: Comments on draft-aboba-sg-experiment-02
  • From: Lakshminath Dondeti
• Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
  • From: Thomas Narten
• Re: Comments on draft-aboba-sg-experiment-02
  • From: Pekka Savola
• Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering)
  • From: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
• Re: Comments on draft-aboba-sg-experiment-03.txt
  • From: Cullen Jennings
• Re: Comments on draft-aboba-sg-experiment-03.txt
  • From: Bernard Aboba
• Re: Comments on draft-aboba-sg-experiment-03.txt
  • From: Cullen Jennings
• Re: comments on draft-aboba-sg-experiment-03.txt
  • From: Bernard Aboba
• Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering)
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering)
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Comments on draft-aboba-sg-experiment-02
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: TMDA backscatter
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: comments on draft-aboba-sg-experiment-03.txt
  • From: Bernard Aboba
• Re: Comments on draft-aboba-sg-experiment-02
  • From: Lakshminath Dondeti
• Re: Comments on draft-aboba-sg-experiment-02
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Comments on draft-aboba-sg-experiment-02
  • From: Lakshminath Dondeti
• Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering)
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering)
  • From: Dave Crocker
• RE: Third Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Comments on draft-aboba-sg-experiment-02
  • From: Spencer Dawkins
• RE: Third Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns
  • From: Pasi.Eronen
• Re: Third Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering)
  • From: Markku Savela
• Re: Comments on draft-aboba-sg-experiment-03.txt
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: Third Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns
  • From: Pasi.Eronen
• Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering)
  • From: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
• Re: TMDA backscatter
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: Comments on draft-aboba-sg-experiment-02
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Comments on draft-aboba-sg-experiment-02
  • From: Eliot Lear
• RE: [IPsec] Re: Last call comments for draft-lepinski-dh-groups-01
  • From: Pasi.Eronen
• Re: Comments on draft-aboba-sg-experiment-03.txt
  • From: Lakshminath Dondeti
• Re: TMDA backscatter
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: Comments on draft-aboba-sg-experiment-03.txt
  • From: Spencer Dawkins
• Re: Comments on draft-aboba-sg-experiment-02
  • From: Bernard Aboba
• Re: Comments on draft-aboba-sg-experiment-02
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: Comments on draft-aboba-sg-experiment-02
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering)
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Follow-up work on NAT-PT
  • From: Olaf M. Kolkman
• Re: Comments on draft-aboba-sg-experiment-03.txt
  • From: Bernard Aboba
• Last Call results: draft-carpenter-rescind-3683-03.txt
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering)
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Last call comments for draft-lepinski-dh-groups-01
  • From: Paul Hoffman
• Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering)
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Comments on draft-aboba-sg-experiment-02
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: Comments on draft-aboba-sg-experiment-02
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering)
  • From: Thomas Narten
• Re: TMDA backscatter
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: TMDA backscatter
  • From: Scott Kitterman
• Re: TMDA backscatter
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: TMDA backscatter
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: TMDA backscatter
  • From: David Morris
• Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering)
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: perfect hindsight (was Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering))
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: TMDA backscatter
  • From: Douglas Otis
• perfect hindsight (was Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering))
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering)
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering)
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: TMDA backscatter
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering)
  • From: Tony Li
• Re: TMDA backscatter
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering)
  • From: David Conrad
• secdir review of draft-garcia-simple-presence-dictionary-06
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering)
  • From: Tony Li
• Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering)
  • From: Ralph Droms
• Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering)
  • From: Ralph Droms
• Re: Comments on draft-aboba-sg-experiment-02
  • From: Spencer Dawkins
• Re: DKIM reputation, was Re: Spammers answering TMDA Queries
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Comments on draft-aboba-sg-experiment-02
  • From: Bernard Aboba
• Re: Last Call: draft-levin-mmusic-xml-media-control (XML Schema for Media Control) to Informational RFC
  • From: Pete Cordell
• Re: Comments on draft-aboba-sg-experiment-02
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Comments on draft-aboba-sg-experiment-02
  • From: Robert Elz
• DKIM reputation, was Re: Spammers answering TMDA Queries
  • From: Tony Finch
• Re: TMDA backscatter
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Last call comments for draft-lepinski-dh-groups-01
  • From: Pasi.Eronen
• RE: Comments on draft-aboba-sg-experiment-02
  • From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
• Re: Last Call: draft-aboba-sg-experiment (Experiment in Study Group Formation within the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Olaf M. Kolkman
• Re: Comment on draft-tschofenig-eap-ikev2-15
  • From: Jari Arkko
• TMDA backscatter
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: Comments on draft-aboba-sg-experiment-02
  • From: Lakshminath Dondeti
• Re: DKIM reputation
  • From: Keith Moore
• DKIM reputation
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: Comments on draft-aboba-sg-experiment-02
  • From: Lakshminath Dondeti
• Re: Comment on draft-tschofenig-eap-ikev2-15
  • From: Lakshminath Dondeti
• Re: Spammers answering TMDA Queries
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Spammers answering TMDA Queries
  • From: Tony Finch
• Re: Comments on draft-aboba-sg-experiment-02
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Vancouver IETF Code Sprint
  • From: IETF Chair
• Re: Last Call: draft-aboba-sg-experiment (Experiment in Study Group Formation within the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Comment on draft-tschofenig-eap-ikev2-15
  • From: Jari Arkko
• RE: Comments on draft-aboba-sg-experiment-02
  • From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
• Re: Comments on draft-aboba-sg-experiment-02
  • From: Eric Rescorla
• Re: Comments on draft-aboba-sg-experiment-02
  • From: Lakshminath Dondeti
• Re: Last Call: draft-aboba-sg-experiment (Experiment in Study Group Formation within the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Olaf M. Kolkman
• Re: Comments on draft-aboba-sg-experiment-02
  • From: Spencer Dawkins
• Re: Comments on draft-aboba-sg-experiment-02
  • From: Jari Arkko
• RE: Comments on draft-aboba-sg-experiment-02
  • From: Gabriel Montenegro
• RE: Comments on draft-aboba-sg-experiment-02
  • From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
• Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-nfs-rdma-problem-statement-07.txt
  • From: Black_David
• Re: Comments on draft-aboba-sg-experiment-02
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: Comments on draft-aboba-sg-experiment-02
  • From: Loa Andersson
• Re: Comments on draft-aboba-sg-experiment-02
  • From: Eric Rescorla
• Comment on draft-tschofenig-eap-ikev2-15
  • From: Eric Rescorla
• Re: Spammers answering TMDA Queries
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: Geography briefiengs for IETF required
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: Comments on draft-aboba-sg-experiment-02
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Comments on draft-aboba-sg-experiment-02
  • From: Eric Rescorla
• RE: Geography briefiengs for IETF required
  • From: Ole Jacobsen
• RE: Geography briefiengs for IETF required
  • From: Livingood, Jason
• RE: IPv4 to IPv6 transition
  • From: Michel Py
• IETF 71: Results of Social Venue Survey
  • From: Livingood, Jason
• Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering)
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Spammers answering TMDA Queries
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
• RE: IPv4 to IPv6 transition
  • From: Michel Py
• Re: Spammers answering TMDA Queries
  • From: Ken Raeburn
• Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition
  • From: Mark Andrews
• Re: Spammers answering TMDA Queries
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: Spammers answering TMDA Queries
  • From: Tom.Petch
• Re: Comments on draft-ietf-lemonade-reconnect-client-06
  • From: Alexey Melnikov
• Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
• On Appeals of IESG and Area Director Actions and Decisions
  • From: The IESG
• Re: Comments on draft-ietf-lemonade-reconnect-client-06
  • From: Eric Rescorla
• Re: [lemonade] Re: Comments on draft-ietf-lemonade-reconnect-client-06
  • From: Mark Crispin
• Re: Comments on draft-ietf-lemonade-reconnect-client-06
  • From: Alexey Melnikov
• Re: Spammers answering TMDA Queries
  • From: Douglas Otis
• RE: IPv4 to IPv6 transition
  • From: Michel Py
• Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
  • From: Thomas Narten
• Re: Spammers answering TMDA Queries
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Spammers answering TMDA Queries
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Comments on draft-ietf-lemonade-reconnect-client-06
  • From: Eric Rescorla
• Re: [Tsvwg] Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-tsvwg-diffserv-class-aggr (Aggregation of DiffServ Service Classes) to Informational RFC
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: On Appeals of IESG and Area Director Actions and Decisions
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: Spammers answering TMDA Queries
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Spammers answering TMDA Queries
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Spammers answering TMDA Queries
  • From: Keith Moore
• RE: Spammers answering TMDA Queries
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Spammers answering TMDA Queries
  • From: Fred Baker
• RE: IPv4 to IPv6 transition
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Spammers answering TMDA Queries
  • From: Fred Baker
• Re: Spammers answering TMDA Queries
  • From: Fred Baker
• Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering)
  • From: Ralph Droms
• Re: Spammers answering TMDA Queries
  • From: Simon Leinen
• Re: Spammers answering TMDA Queries
  • From: SM
• Re: Spammers answering TMDA Queries
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: Spammers answering TMDA Queries
  • From: Keith Moore
• RE: IPv4 to IPv6 transition
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering)
  • From: Ralph Droms
• RE: Spammers answering TMDA Queries
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition
  • From: Artur Hecker
• Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Spammers answering TMDA Queries
  • From: Fred Baker
• RE: IPv4 to IPv6 transition
  • From: Michel Py
• Re: [Tsvwg] Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-tsvwg-diffserv-class-aggr (Aggregation of DiffServ Service Classes) to Informational RFC
  • From: ken carlberg
• RE: Spammers answering TMDA Queries
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Spammers answering TMDA Queries
  • From: John Levine
• Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition
  • From: David Conrad
• Re: Spammers answering TMDA Queries
  • From: Fred Baker
• Re: [Tsvwg] Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-tsvwg-diffserv-class-aggr (Aggregation of DiffServ Service Classes) to Informational RFC
  • From: Marshall Eubanks
• Re: [Tsvwg] Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-tsvwg-diffserv-class-aggr (Aggregation of DiffServ Service Classes) to Informational RFC
  • From: Pekka Savola
• Re: Spammers answering TMDA Queries
  • From: John Levine
• Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: Spammers answering TMDA Queries
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: Spammers answering TMDA Queries
  • From: Clint Chaplin
• Re: Spammers answering TMDA Queries
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-dnsop-reflectors-are-evil-04.txt
  • From: Simon Leinen
• Re: Spammers answering TMDA Queries
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-dnsop-reflectors-are-evil (Preventing Use of Recursive Nameservers in Reflector Attacks) to BCP
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: Spammers answering TMDA Queries
  • From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand
• Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-dnsop-reflectors-are-evil-04.txt
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition
  • From: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
• Re: [DNSOP] Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-dnsop-reflectors-are-evil (Preventing Use of Recursive Nameservers in Reflector Attacks) to BCP
  • From: Tim Chown
• RE: IPv4 to IPv6 transition
  • From: John Day
• Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition
  • From: Ole Jacobsen
• Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition
  • From: Ruri Hiromi
• Re: [DNSOP] Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-dnsop-reflectors-are-evil (Preventing Use of Recursive Nameservers in Reflector Attacks) to BCP
  • From: Paul Wouters
• Re: [DNSOP] Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-dnsop-reflectors-are-evil (Preventing Use of Recursive Nameservers in Reflector Attacks) to BCP
  • From: Paul Wouters
• [secdir] security review of draft-edwards-urn-smpte-02
  • From: Tobias Gondrom
• Re: [DNSOP] Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-dnsop-reflectors-are-evil (Preventing Use of Recursive Nameservers in Reflector Attacks) to BCP
  • From: Paul Wouters
• Re: [IPFIX] draft-ietf-ipfix-protocol-26.txt
  • From: Boschi, Elisa
• Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-dnsop-reflectors-are-evil-04.txt
  • From: Jeffrey Hutzelman
• Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition
  • From: Tony Hansen
• Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition
  • From: Marc Manthey
• Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition
  • From: Ruri Hiromi
• RE: IPv4 to IPv6 transition
  • From: Ray Plzak
• RE: [secdir] secdir review ofdraft-ietf-dnsop-reflectors-are-evil-04.txt
  • From: michael.dillon
• Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-dnsop-reflectors-are-evil (Preventing Use of Recursive Nameservers in Reflector Attacks) to BCP
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: Would someone help the secretariat figure out why they cannot route to teredo addresses?
  • From: Arifumi Matsumoto
• RE: IPv4 to IPv6 transition
  • From: Michel Py
• Re: Random addresses answering TMDA Queries
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Random addresses answering TMDA Queries
  • From: John L
• Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition
  • From: Ruri Hiromi
• Re: Spammers answering TMDA Queries
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Random addresses answering TMDA Queries
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: Random addresses answering TMDA Queries
  • From: John Levine
• Re: Spammers answering TMDA Queries
  • From: Michael Thomas
• RE: Spammers answering TMDA Queries
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Spammers answering TMDA Queries
  • From: Scott Kitterman
• Re: Spammers answering TMDA Queries
  • From: Paul Hoffman
• Spammers answering TMDA Queries
  • From: Russ Housley