On 2007-11-29, at 6:28, ext ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx wrote:
I agree with your reasoning. I should have asked, why do *ALL* IETF meetings have to be monolithic and all-inclusive?
They don't. Several WGs are holding interim meetings between the IETF meetings. I'm not sure if there have been joint interims with multiple WGs attending, but that could make sense if there's a difficult piece of work that they need to agree on. Our rules allow this.
Lars _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf