IETF Discussion

• Thread Index

• Re: Information-Centric Networking (icnrg) RG Interim Meeting: 2016-07-17 CHANGED
  • From: Alvaro Retana (aretana)
• IETF early bird deadline, Hackathon, and today's webinar
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Information-Centric Networking (icnrg) RG Interim Meeting: 2016-07-17 CHANGED
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• notes from BOF coordination call
  • From: IETF Chair
• RE: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: bruno.decraene
• Re: Genart LC (and likely telechat) review : draft-ietf-trill-tree-selection-04
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Gen-Art LC review of draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-pw-over-bidir-lsp-08
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-trill-channel-tunnel-09
  • From: Jari Arkko
• RE: Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-trill-channel-tunnel-09
  • From: Peter Yee
• Re: Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-trill-channel-tunnel-09
  • From: Donald Eastlake
• Berlin Code Sprint
  • From: IETF Chair
• Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-trill-channel-tunnel-09
  • From: Peter Yee
• RE: [alto] IPR Disclosure Carlos Pignataro's Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-alto-deployments belonging to Alcatel Lucent
  • From: Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR)
• Re: [alto] IPR Disclosure Carlos Pignataro's Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-alto-deployments belonging to Alcatel Lucent
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: [alto] IPR Disclosure Carlos Pignataro's Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-alto-deployments belonging to Alcatel Lucent
  • From: Sebastian Kiesel
• Re: [alto] IPR Disclosure Carlos Pignataro's Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-alto-deployments belonging to Alcatel Lucent
  • From: Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
• RE: [alto] IPR Disclosure Carlos Pignataro's Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-alto-deployments belonging to Alcatel Lucent
  • From: Scharf, Michael (Nokia - DE)
• Re: [alto] IPR Disclosure Carlos Pignataro's Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-alto-deployments belonging to Alcatel Lucent
  • From: Y. Richard Yang
• Re: [alto] IPR Disclosure Carlos Pignataro's Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-alto-deployments belonging to Alcatel Lucent
  • From: Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
• Re: [alto] IPR Disclosure Carlos Pignataro's Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-alto-deployments belonging to Alcatel Lucent
  • From: Mirja Kühlewind
• Re: Comments on draft-deng-chinese-names-03.txt
  • From: Zhen Cao
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Nick Hilliard
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: heasley
• RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-trill-channel-tunnel-09
  • From: Peter Yee
• Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-trill-channel-tunnel-09
  • From: Donald Eastlake
• RE: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Michel Py
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Marco Marzetti
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Job Snijders
• Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-trill-channel-tunnel-09
  • From: Peter Yee
• RE: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Michel Py
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Christopher Morrow
• Re: Genart LC (and likely telechat) review : draft-ietf-trill-tree-selection-04
  • From: Robert Sparks
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: joel jaeggli
• Re: Genart LC (and likely telechat) review : draft-ietf-trill-tree-selection-04
  • From: Donald Eastlake
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Nick Hilliard
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Job Snijders
• RE: Gen-Art LC review of draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-pw-over-bidir-lsp-08
  • From: Mach Chen
• Gen-Art LC review of draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-pw-over-bidir-lsp-08
  • From: Roni Even
• Gen-Art LC review of draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-pw-over-bidir-lsp-08
  • From: Roni Even
• RE: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Michel Py
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Christopher Morrow
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: heasley
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: heasley
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Job Snijders
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: David Farmer
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Jared Mauch
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Nick Hilliard
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: joel jaeggli
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Job Snijders
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Nick Hilliard
• Re: Genart LC (and likely telechat) review : draft-ietf-trill-tree-selection-04
  • From: Donald Eastlake
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Gert Doering
• Re: [Spasm] WG Review: Some PKIX and SMIME (spasm)
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Job Snijders
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Nick Hilliard
• RE: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Michel Py
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Job Snijders
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Nick Hilliard
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: joel jaeggli
• Genart LC (and likely telechat) review : draft-ietf-trill-tree-selection-04
  • From: Robert Sparks
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Job Snijders
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Thomas Mangin
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Job Snijders
• Call for Participation: ACM, IRTF & ISOC Applied Networking Research Workshop 2016
  • From: Eggert, Lars
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Christopher Morrow
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Gert Doering
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Christopher Morrow
• Re: [96attendees] : REG: Taxi fare from Tegel Airport to IETF Venue
  • From: Christopher Morrow
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: joel jaeggli
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Christopher Morrow
• RE: [96attendees] : REG: Taxi fare from Tegel Airport to IETF Venue
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: side event Wed. 20 July at IETF 96: "Open Debate on the Politics of Encryption"
  • From: Joseph Lorenzo Hall
• Re: side event Wed. 20 July at IETF 96: "Open Debate on the Politics of Encryption"
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: joel jaeggli
• RE: [96attendees] : REG: Taxi fare from Tegel Airport to IETF Venue
  • From: Sudhin Jacob
• Re: [96attendees] : REG: Taxi fare from Tegel Airport to IETF Venue
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• : REG: Taxi fare from Tegel Airport to IETF Venue
  • From: Sudhin Jacob
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: joel jaeggli
• RE: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Michel Py
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: John Kristoff
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: joel jaeggli
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Nick Hilliard
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Job Snijders
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Nick Hilliard
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Job Snijders
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Nick Hilliard
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Christopher Morrow
• Re: TSV-ART review of draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-roadblock-avoidance
  • From: Tim Wicinski
• RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Michel Py
• Re: side event Wed. 20 July at IETF 96: "Open Debate on the Politics of Encryption"
  • From: nalini.elkins
• Re: [saag] side event Wed. 20 July at IETF 96: "Open Debate on the Politics of Encryption"
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• RE: side event Wed. 20 July at IETF 96: "Open Debate on the Politics of Encryption"
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• side event Wed. 20 July at IETF 96: "Open Debate on the Politics of Encryption"
  • From: Joseph Lorenzo Hall
• Re: FINAL list of volunteers for the 2016-2017 NomCom
  • From: Lucy Lynch
• Re: FINAL list of volunteers for the 2016-2017 NomCom
  • From: Michael StJohns
• FW: [hackathon] Reminder - Need to register separately for hackathon
  • From: Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
• IETF 96 FInal Agenda
  • From: IETF Agenda
• IETF 96 Social Event Tickets Now Available!
  • From: IETF Secretariat
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Christopher Morrow
• Re: IETF Sustainability - New Website Launch
  • From: Kathy Brown
• RE: Last Call: <draft-holmberg-dispatch-rfc7315-updates-06.txt> (Updates to Private Header (P-Header) Extension Usage in Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Requests/Responses) to Informational RFC
  • From: Christer Holmberg
• RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Michel Py
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: John Kristoff
• RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Michel Py
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Christopher Morrow
• RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Michel Py
• Re: www.ietf.org Revamp Update
  • From: Joe Hildebrand
• RE: www.ietf.org Revamp Update
  • From: Tony Hain
• Re: www.ietf.org Revamp Update
  • From: Joe Hildebrand
• Re: WG Review: Meeting Venue (mtgvenue)
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: IMHO we really need a discussion of this imaginative proposal.
  • From: Jared Mauch
• IMHO we really need a discussion of this imaginative proposal.
  • From: Richard Shockey
• Re: Facilitators experiment
  • From: S Moonesamy
• IETF 96 Preliminary Agenda
  • From: IETF Agenda
• Re: TSV-ART review of draft-ietf-forces-interfelfb
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: TSV-ART review of draft-ietf-forces-interfelfb
  • From: Jamal Hadi Salim
• Call for Participation: ACM, IRTF & ISOC Applied Networking Research Workshop 2016
  • From: Eggert, Lars
• Re: Long-term IETF evolution thoughts
  • From: Rich Kulawiec
• www.ietf.org Revamp Update
  • From: IETF Chair
• Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective
  • From: Margaret Cullen
• Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-dmarc-interoperability-15
  • From: Jari Arkko
• TSV-ART review of draft-ietf-forces-interfelfb
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective]
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: IETF Sustainability - New Website Launch
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: IETF Sustainability - New Website Launch
  • From: Dave Taht
• Re: Long-term IETF evolution thoughts
  • From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
• Re: Long-term IETF evolution thoughts
  • From: Dave Taht
• Re: Long-term IETF evolution thoughts
  • From: Michael Richardson
• FW: [hackathon] extended hacking
  • From: Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
• RE: IETF Sustainability - New Website Launch
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: IETF Sustainability - New Website Launch
  • From: Bert Wijnen (IETF)
• Re: IETF Sustainability - New Website Launch
  • From: lloyd.wood
• Re: Long-term IETF evolution thoughts
  • From: Randy Bush
• IETF Sustainability - New Website Launch
  • From: IETF Chair
• Re: Long-term IETF evolution thoughts
  • From: Michael Richardson
• TSV-ART review of draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-roadblock-avoidance
  • From: Brian Trammell
• Berlin BoFs
  • From: IETF Chair
• Re: Long-term IETF evolution thoughts
  • From: Dave Taht
• A somewhat different thought about IETF evolution
  • From: Steve Crocker
• Re: Long-term IETF evolution thoughts
  • From: Ross Finlayson
• RE: Long-term IETF evolution thoughts
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: Long-term IETF evolution thoughts
  • From: Jaap Akkerhuis
• Re: Long-term IETF evolution thoughts
  • From: Dave Taht
• long term ietf evolution comments
  • From: Dave Taht
• Re: Long-term IETF evolution thoughts
  • From: Rich Kulawiec
• Re: Facilitators experiment
  • From: Doug Ewell
• Re: Long-term IETF evolution thoughts
  • From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
• 3. Focus on linking open standards to code, operationals, and interoperability.
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Long-term IETF evolution thoughts
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective]
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• RE: actions related to improving IETF meeting selections
  • From: Sheng Jiang
• Re: actions related to improving IETF meeting selections
  • From: Melinda Shore
• RE: actions related to improving IETF meeting selections
  • From: Sheng Jiang
• Re: Long-term IETF evolution thoughts
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective]
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: Under-represented communities [Re: Long-term IETF evolution thoughts]
  • From: nalini.elkins
• Re: Long-term IETF evolution thoughts
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Under-represented communities [Re: Long-term IETF evolution thoughts]
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: actions related to improving IETF meeting selections
  • From: nalini.elkins
• Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective]
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective]
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective]
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: actions related to improving IETF meeting selections
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: actions related to improving IETF meeting selections
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective]
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: actions related to improving IETF meeting selections
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: actions related to improving IETF meeting selections
  • From: nalini.elkins
• Re: Long-term IETF evolution thoughts
  • From: nalini.elkins
• Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective]
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Long-term IETF evolution thoughts
  • From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
• Re: Facilitators experiment
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Long-term IETF evolution thoughts
  • From: IETF Chair
• Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective]
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective]
  • From: Lloyd Wood
• RE: actions related to improving IETF meeting selections
  • From: Sheng Jiang
• Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective]
  • From: John Leslie
• Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective]
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Ben Campbell
• Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-dmarc-interoperability-15
  • From: Peter Yee
• Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Gmail
• Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: IAB volunteers
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Donald Eastlake
• Re: [tsvwg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis-13.txt> (UDP Usage Guidelines) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Gorry Fairhurst
• Re: [tsvwg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis-13.txt> (UDP Usage Guidelines) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Ca By
• Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Scott Bradner
• Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: my summary of discussion regarding IETF #100
  • From: John Curran
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis-13.txt> (UDP Usage Guidelines) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Brian Trammell
• RE: my summary of discussion regarding IETF #100
  • From: Tony Hain
• Re: [Idr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-idr-ix-bgp-route-server-10.txt> (Internet Exchange BGP Route Server) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Marco Marzetti
• Re: [Idr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-idr-ix-bgp-route-server-10.txt> (Internet Exchange BGP Route Server) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Robert Raszuk
• Re: [Idr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-idr-ix-bgp-route-server-10.txt> (Internet Exchange BGP Route Server) to Proposed Standard
  • From: David Huberman
• Re: [Idr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-idr-ix-bgp-route-server-10.txt> (Internet Exchange BGP Route Server) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Marco Marzetti
• Re: [Idr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-idr-ix-bgp-route-server-10.txt> (Internet Exchange BGP Route Server) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Nick Hilliard
• Re: [Idr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-idr-ix-bgp-route-server-10.txt> (Internet Exchange BGP Route Server) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Marco Marzetti
• Re: my summary of discussion regarding IETF #100
  • From: Dean Willis
• Re: CIRI Human Rights Data Project
  • From: Andrew Allen
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis-13.txt> (UDP Usage Guidelines) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Mark Allman
• Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [Idr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-idr-ix-bgp-route-server-10.txt> (Internet Exchange BGP Route Server) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Nick Hilliard
• Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: John Levine
• Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: John Levine
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Ted Lemon
• RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: MH Michael Hammer (5304)
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: lloyd.wood
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: lloyd.wood
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: lloyd.wood
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Yoav Nir
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: John C Klensin
• A message from the facilitators about the current threads
  • From: Christian Huitema
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Michal Krsek
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Marie-Jose Montpetit
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: my summary of discussion regarding IETF #100
  • From: Leif Johansson
• Re: Value of meeting attendance (was Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100)
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Fernando Gont
• my summary of discussion regarding IETF #100
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Robert O'Callahan
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: James Seng
• Re: Value of meeting attendance (was Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100)
  • From: Stephen Strowes
• RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Dave Hood
• RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Jamie Baxter
• RE: Value of meeting attendance (was Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100)
  • From: Christer Holmberg
• Value of meeting attendance (was Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100)
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: kathleen . moriarty . ietf
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Michael StJohns
• RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Christer Holmberg
• Re: IAOC response to question of clarification Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Rich Kulawiec
• Success metrics Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Bill Mills
• IAOC response to question of clarification Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Leslie Daigle
• Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-sidr-rfc6485bis-05
  • From: Roni Even
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Margaret Cullen
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Donald Eastlake
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Leslie Daigle
• Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Marc Blanchet
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Leslie Daigle
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: John C Klensin
• RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis
  • From: Roni Even
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: PEDRO ANDRES ARANDA GUTIERREZ
• RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: MH Michael Hammer (5304)
• Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: lloyd.wood
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Bert Wijnen (IETF)
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• Why we meet (was Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100)
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Dan Harkins
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Derek Jett
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Aaron Morgan
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: James Seng
• Re: IETF-100 maybe it's mostly been said? (Was: Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100)
  • From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Joe Abley
• CIRI Human Rights Data Project
  • From: David Benham (dbenham)
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Joel Snyder
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Lloyd Wood
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Tony Rutkowski
• IETF-100 maybe it's mostly been said? (Was: Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100)
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Carlos Martinez
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Margaret Cullen
• RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Christer Holmberg
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Margaret Cullen
• Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Niels ten Oever
• Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Michael StJohns
• Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Jeffrey Haas
• Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Niels ten Oever
• Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Lawrence Conroy
• Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: nalini.elkins
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Fred Baker (fred)
• Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Ole Jacobsen
• Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: nalini.elkins
• RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang
• Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Barry Raveendran Greene
• Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Fred Baker (fred)
• Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: nalini.elkins
• Re: IAB volunteers
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Barry Raveendran Greene
• Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Ole Jacobsen
• Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: nalini.elkins
• Re: IAB volunteers
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Yoav Nir
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: nalini.elkins
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: tom p.
• Re: IAB volunteers
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: John Hoe
• IETF 96 - Meeting Information
  • From: IETF Secretariat
• Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Ole Jacobsen
• Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Harish Pillay
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Yoav Nir
• Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: nalini.elkins
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• RE: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Hutton, Andrew
• Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: IAB volunteers
  • From: Paul Wouters
• Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Dhruv Dhody
• Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Leslie Daigle
• Re: A couple of meta points -- IETF 100, Singapore, onwards
  • From: Michal Krsek
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: otroan
• Re: A couple of meta points -- IETF 100, Singapore, onwards
  • From: Sandoche Balakrichenan
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Ole Troan
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Vinayak Hegde
• IAB volunteers
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: tom p.
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Mikael Abrahamsson
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Sandoche Balakrichenan
• RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Jose Saldana
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Mark Nottingham
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Cullen Jennings
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Lixia Zhang
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Xiaohong Deng
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Donald Eastlake
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• Re: [E] Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Gross, Scott W
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Tony Rutkowski
• Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Benson Schliesser
• Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Jakob Heitz
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: kathleen . moriarty . ietf
• Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Benson Schliesser
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Marie-Jose Montpetit
• A Modest Proposal
  • From: jswift.ietf
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Benson Schliesser
• Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Margaret Cullen
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Margaret Cullen
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: James Seng
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Mikael Abrahamsson
• Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: George Michaelson
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: IAOC Chair
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Ted Lemon
• RE: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: MH Michael Hammer (5304)
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Cullen Jennings
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Vinayak Hegde
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Vinayak Hegde
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Paul Wouters
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Cullen Jennings
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Michal Krsek
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: build personal contacts outside of meetings [was IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input]
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: A couple of meta points -- IETF 100, Singapore, onwards
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: nalini.elkins
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Adam Roach
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: nalini.elkins
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Michael StJohns
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Margaret Cullen
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Mikael Abrahamsson
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Michael StJohns
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: nalini.elkins
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Ole Jacobsen
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: nalini.elkins
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: [Idr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-idr-ix-bgp-route-server-10.txt> (Internet Exchange BGP Route Server) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Marco Marzetti
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: nalini.elkins
• Re: A couple of meta points -- IETF 100, Singapore, onwards
  • From: Ole Jacobsen
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Patrick McManus
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: A couple of meta points -- IETF 100, Singapore, onwards
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [Idr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-idr-ix-bgp-route-server-10.txt> (Internet Exchange BGP Route Server) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Marco Marzetti
• Re: A couple of meta points -- IETF 100, Singapore, onwards
  • From: George Michaelson
• Re: A couple of meta points -- IETF 100, Singapore, onwards
  • From: Ben Campbell
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: Testimony to US Commerce Committee
  • From: Fred Baker (fred)
• RE: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Andrew Allen
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: A couple of meta points -- IETF 100, Singapore, onwards
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Margaret Cullen
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Barry Raveendran Greene
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Testimony to US Commerce Committee
  • From: IAB Chair
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Mikael Abrahamsson
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Alia Atlas
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: John Levine
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Alia Atlas
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Kathleen Moriarty
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Alia Atlas
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Barry Raveendran Greene
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: A couple of meta points -- IETF 100, Singapore, onwards
  • From: Ole Jacobsen
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input (off-topic)
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: build personal contacts outside of meetings
  • From: Andrew G. Malis
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Alia Atlas
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Alia Atlas
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Kathleen Moriarty
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Yoav Nir
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Yoav Nir
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Adam Roach
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Melinda Shore
• IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Barry Raveendran Greene
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Yoav Nir
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Adam Roach
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Adam Roach
• Re: A couple of meta points -- IETF 100, Singapore, onwards
  • From: Adam Roach
• Re: build personal contacts outside of meetings [was IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input]
  • From: HANSEN, TONY L
• Re: A couple of meta points -- IETF 100, Singapore, onwards
  • From: Leslie Daigle
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Havana and Juggalos (was: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input)
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: Havana and Juggalos (was: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input)
  • From: Theodore V Faber
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: kathleen . moriarty . ietf
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Richard Barnes
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Yoav Nir
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Adam Roach
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: A couple of meta points -- IETF 100, Singapore, onwards
  • From: Adam Roach
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Eric Rescorla
• Re: build personal contacts outside of meetings [was IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input]
  • From: nalini.elkins
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Eric Rescorla
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Sandoche Balakrichenan
• Re: A couple of meta points -- IETF 100, Singapore, onwards
  • From: Leslie Daigle
• Re: build personal contacts outside of meetings
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: build personal contacts outside of meetings
  • From: kathleen . moriarty . ietf
• Re: build personal contacts outside of meetings [was IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input]
  • From: kathleen . moriarty . ietf
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: build personal contacts outside of meetings
  • From: Alia Atlas
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Mikael Abrahamsson
• Re: build personal contacts outside of meetings
  • From: Loa Andersson
• Re: build personal contacts outside of meetings [was IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input]
  • From: kathleen . moriarty . ietf
• Re: build personal contacts outside of meetings
  • From: Joel Jaeggli
• Re: A couple of meta points -- IETF 100, Singapore, onwards
  • From: Jari Arkko
• RE: build personal contacts outside of meetings
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Gen-ART LC review of draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis
  • From: Roni Even
• Re: A couple of meta points -- IETF 100, Singapore, onwards
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: A couple of meta points -- IETF 100, Singapore, onwards
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: lloyd.wood
• Re: A couple of meta points -- IETF 100, Singapore, onwards
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: build personal contacts outside of meetings [was IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input]
  • From: Alia Atlas
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: lloyd.wood
• Re: build personal contacts outside of meetings [was IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input]
  • From: nalini.elkins
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Randall Gellens
• build personal contacts outside of meetings [was IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input]
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: S Moonesamy
• RE: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Christian Huitema
• Re: A couple of meta points -- IETF 100, Singapore, onwards
  • From: Alissa Cooper
• Mailing lists, venues, Singapore, IETF 100
  • From: Leslie Daigle
• Re: A couple of meta points -- IETF 100, Singapore, onwards
  • From: Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Margaret Cullen
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: [dmarc-ietf] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dmarc-interoperability-15.txt> (Interoperability Issues Between DMARC and Indirect Email Flows) to Informational RFC
  • From: Franck Martin
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Cullen Jennings
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Paul Wouters
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Behcet Sarikaya
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Jari Arkko
• A couple of meta points -- IETF 100, Singapore, onwards
  • From: Leslie Daigle
• RE: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: John E Drake
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Harish Pillay
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Bob Hinden
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Harish Pillay
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Toerless Eckert
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Allison Mankin
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: lloyd.wood
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Melinda Shore
• RE: [dmarc-ietf] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dmarc-interoperability-15.txt> (Interoperability Issues Between DMARC and Indirect Email Flows) to Informational RFC
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: l.wood
• RE: [dmarc-ietf] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dmarc-interoperability-15.txt> (Interoperability Issues Between DMARC and Indirect Email Flows) to Informational RFC
  • From: John R Levine
• RE: [dmarc-ietf] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dmarc-interoperability-15.txt> (Interoperability Issues Between DMARC and Indirect Email Flows) to Informational RFC
  • From: Christian Huitema
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Paul Wouters
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: nalini.elkins
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: [dmarc-ietf] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dmarc-interoperability-15.txt> (Interoperability Issues Between DMARC and Indirect Email Flows) to Informational RFC
  • From: John Levine
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Andrew Allen
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: [dmarc-ietf] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dmarc-interoperability-15.txt> (Interoperability Issues Between DMARC and Indirect Email Flows) to Informational RFC
  • From: Alexey Melnikov
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: kathleen . moriarty . ietf
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Loa Andersson
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dmarc-interoperability-15.txt> (Interoperability Issues Between DMARC and Indirect Email Flows) to Informational RFC
  • From: John Levine
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: John Levine
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Lixia Zhang
• IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Richard Barnes
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dmarc-interoperability-15.txt> (Interoperability Issues Between DMARC and Indirect Email Flows) to Informational RFC
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Michal Krsek
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Peterson, Jon
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: nalini.elkins
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Michal Krsek
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ