IETF Discussion
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- Re: side event Wed. 20 July at IETF 96: "Open Debate on the Politics of Encryption"
- Re: [saag] side event Wed. 20 July at IETF 96: "Open Debate on the Politics of Encryption"
- RE: side event Wed. 20 July at IETF 96: "Open Debate on the Politics of Encryption"
- side event Wed. 20 July at IETF 96: "Open Debate on the Politics of Encryption"
- From: Joseph Lorenzo Hall
- Re: FINAL list of volunteers for the 2016-2017 NomCom
- Re: FINAL list of volunteers for the 2016-2017 NomCom
- FW: [hackathon] Reminder - Need to register separately for hackathon
- From: Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
- IETF 96 FInal Agenda
- IETF 96 Social Event Tickets Now Available!
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
- Re: IETF Sustainability - New Website Launch
- RE: Last Call: <draft-holmberg-dispatch-rfc7315-updates-06.txt> (Updates to Private Header (P-Header) Extension Usage in Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Requests/Responses) to Informational RFC
- RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
- RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
- RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
- Re: www.ietf.org Revamp Update
- RE: www.ietf.org Revamp Update
- Re: www.ietf.org Revamp Update
- Re: WG Review: Meeting Venue (mtgvenue)
- Re: IMHO we really need a discussion of this imaginative proposal.
- IMHO we really need a discussion of this imaginative proposal.
- Re: Facilitators experiment
- IETF 96 Preliminary Agenda
- Re: TSV-ART review of draft-ietf-forces-interfelfb
- Re: TSV-ART review of draft-ietf-forces-interfelfb
- Call for Participation: ACM, IRTF & ISOC Applied Networking Research Workshop 2016
- Re: Long-term IETF evolution thoughts
- www.ietf.org Revamp Update
- Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective
- Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-dmarc-interoperability-15
- TSV-ART review of draft-ietf-forces-interfelfb
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective]
- Re: IETF Sustainability - New Website Launch
- Re: IETF Sustainability - New Website Launch
- Re: Long-term IETF evolution thoughts
- From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: Long-term IETF evolution thoughts
- Re: Long-term IETF evolution thoughts
- FW: [hackathon] extended hacking
- From: Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
- RE: IETF Sustainability - New Website Launch
- Re: IETF Sustainability - New Website Launch
- Re: IETF Sustainability - New Website Launch
- Re: Long-term IETF evolution thoughts
- IETF Sustainability - New Website Launch
- Re: Long-term IETF evolution thoughts
- TSV-ART review of draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-roadblock-avoidance
- Berlin BoFs
- Re: Long-term IETF evolution thoughts
- A somewhat different thought about IETF evolution
- Re: Long-term IETF evolution thoughts
- RE: Long-term IETF evolution thoughts
- Re: Long-term IETF evolution thoughts
- Re: Long-term IETF evolution thoughts
- long term ietf evolution comments
- Re: Long-term IETF evolution thoughts
- Re: Facilitators experiment
- Re: Long-term IETF evolution thoughts
- From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
- 3. Focus on linking open standards to code, operationals, and interoperability.
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Long-term IETF evolution thoughts
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective]
- RE: actions related to improving IETF meeting selections
- Re: actions related to improving IETF meeting selections
- RE: actions related to improving IETF meeting selections
- Re: Long-term IETF evolution thoughts
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective]
- From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: Under-represented communities [Re: Long-term IETF evolution thoughts]
- Re: Long-term IETF evolution thoughts
- Under-represented communities [Re: Long-term IETF evolution thoughts]
- Re: actions related to improving IETF meeting selections
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective]
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective]
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective]
- Re: actions related to improving IETF meeting selections
- Re: actions related to improving IETF meeting selections
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective]
- Re: actions related to improving IETF meeting selections
- Re: actions related to improving IETF meeting selections
- Re: Long-term IETF evolution thoughts
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective]
- Re: Long-term IETF evolution thoughts
- From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: Facilitators experiment
- Long-term IETF evolution thoughts
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective]
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective]
- RE: actions related to improving IETF meeting selections
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective]
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective]
- Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
- Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
- Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
- Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-dmarc-interoperability-15
- Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
- Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
- Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
- Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
- Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
- Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
- Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
- Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
- Re: IAB volunteers
- Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
- Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
- Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
- Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
- Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
- Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
- Re: [tsvwg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis-13.txt> (UDP Usage Guidelines) to Best Current Practice
- Re: [tsvwg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis-13.txt> (UDP Usage Guidelines) to Best Current Practice
- Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
- Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
- Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
- Re: my summary of discussion regarding IETF #100
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis-13.txt> (UDP Usage Guidelines) to Best Current Practice
- RE: my summary of discussion regarding IETF #100
- Re: [Idr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-idr-ix-bgp-route-server-10.txt> (Internet Exchange BGP Route Server) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [Idr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-idr-ix-bgp-route-server-10.txt> (Internet Exchange BGP Route Server) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [Idr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-idr-ix-bgp-route-server-10.txt> (Internet Exchange BGP Route Server) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [Idr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-idr-ix-bgp-route-server-10.txt> (Internet Exchange BGP Route Server) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [Idr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-idr-ix-bgp-route-server-10.txt> (Internet Exchange BGP Route Server) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [Idr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-idr-ix-bgp-route-server-10.txt> (Internet Exchange BGP Route Server) to Proposed Standard
- Re: my summary of discussion regarding IETF #100
- Re: CIRI Human Rights Data Project
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis-13.txt> (UDP Usage Guidelines) to Best Current Practice
- Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
- Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
- Re: [Idr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-idr-ix-bgp-route-server-10.txt> (Internet Exchange BGP Route Server) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- From: MH Michael Hammer (5304)
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- A message from the facilitators about the current threads
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- From: Marie-Jose Montpetit
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: my summary of discussion regarding IETF #100
- Re: Value of meeting attendance (was Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100)
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- my summary of discussion regarding IETF #100
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: Value of meeting attendance (was Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100)
- RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- RE: Value of meeting attendance (was Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100)
- Value of meeting attendance (was Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100)
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- From: kathleen . moriarty . ietf
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: IAOC response to question of clarification Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Success metrics Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- IAOC response to question of clarification Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-sidr-rfc6485bis-05
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- From: PEDRO ANDRES ARANDA GUTIERREZ
- RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- From: MH Michael Hammer (5304)
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Why we meet (was Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100)
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: IETF-100 maybe it's mostly been said? (Was: Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100)
- From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- CIRI Human Rights Data Project
- From: David Benham (dbenham)
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- IETF-100 maybe it's mostly been said? (Was: Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100)
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- From: Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- From: Barry Raveendran Greene
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: IAB volunteers
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- From: Barry Raveendran Greene
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: IAB volunteers
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: IAB volunteers
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- IETF 96 - Meeting Information
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- RE: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: IAB volunteers
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: A couple of meta points -- IETF 100, Singapore, onwards
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: A couple of meta points -- IETF 100, Singapore, onwards
- From: Sandoche Balakrichenan
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- IAB volunteers
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- From: Sandoche Balakrichenan
- RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: [E] Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- From: kathleen . moriarty . ietf
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- From: Marie-Jose Montpetit
- A Modest Proposal
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- RE: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- From: MH Michael Hammer (5304)
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: build personal contacts outside of meetings [was IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input]
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: A couple of meta points -- IETF 100, Singapore, onwards
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Idr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-idr-ix-bgp-route-server-10.txt> (Internet Exchange BGP Route Server) to Proposed Standard
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: A couple of meta points -- IETF 100, Singapore, onwards
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: A couple of meta points -- IETF 100, Singapore, onwards
- Re: [Idr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-idr-ix-bgp-route-server-10.txt> (Internet Exchange BGP Route Server) to Proposed Standard
- Re: A couple of meta points -- IETF 100, Singapore, onwards
- Re: A couple of meta points -- IETF 100, Singapore, onwards
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: Testimony to US Commerce Committee
- RE: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: A couple of meta points -- IETF 100, Singapore, onwards
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- From: Barry Raveendran Greene
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Testimony to US Commerce Committee
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- From: Barry Raveendran Greene
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: A couple of meta points -- IETF 100, Singapore, onwards
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input (off-topic)
- Re: build personal contacts outside of meetings
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- From: Barry Raveendran Greene
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: A couple of meta points -- IETF 100, Singapore, onwards
- Re: build personal contacts outside of meetings [was IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input]
- Re: A couple of meta points -- IETF 100, Singapore, onwards
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: Havana and Juggalos (was: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input)
- From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: Havana and Juggalos (was: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input)
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- From: kathleen . moriarty . ietf
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: A couple of meta points -- IETF 100, Singapore, onwards
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: build personal contacts outside of meetings [was IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input]
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- From: Sandoche Balakrichenan
- Re: A couple of meta points -- IETF 100, Singapore, onwards
- Re: build personal contacts outside of meetings
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis
- Re: build personal contacts outside of meetings
- From: kathleen . moriarty . ietf
- Re: build personal contacts outside of meetings [was IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input]
- From: kathleen . moriarty . ietf
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: build personal contacts outside of meetings
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: build personal contacts outside of meetings
- Re: build personal contacts outside of meetings [was IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input]
- From: kathleen . moriarty . ietf
- Re: build personal contacts outside of meetings
- Re: A couple of meta points -- IETF 100, Singapore, onwards
- RE: build personal contacts outside of meetings
- Gen-ART LC review of draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis
- Re: A couple of meta points -- IETF 100, Singapore, onwards
- Re: A couple of meta points -- IETF 100, Singapore, onwards
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: A couple of meta points -- IETF 100, Singapore, onwards
- Re: build personal contacts outside of meetings [was IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input]
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: build personal contacts outside of meetings [was IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input]
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- build personal contacts outside of meetings [was IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input]
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- RE: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: A couple of meta points -- IETF 100, Singapore, onwards
- Mailing lists, venues, Singapore, IETF 100
- Re: A couple of meta points -- IETF 100, Singapore, onwards
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dmarc-interoperability-15.txt> (Interoperability Issues Between DMARC and Indirect Email Flows) to Informational RFC
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- A couple of meta points -- IETF 100, Singapore, onwards
- RE: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- RE: [dmarc-ietf] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dmarc-interoperability-15.txt> (Interoperability Issues Between DMARC and Indirect Email Flows) to Informational RFC
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- RE: [dmarc-ietf] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dmarc-interoperability-15.txt> (Interoperability Issues Between DMARC and Indirect Email Flows) to Informational RFC
- RE: [dmarc-ietf] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dmarc-interoperability-15.txt> (Interoperability Issues Between DMARC and Indirect Email Flows) to Informational RFC
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dmarc-interoperability-15.txt> (Interoperability Issues Between DMARC and Indirect Email Flows) to Informational RFC
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dmarc-interoperability-15.txt> (Interoperability Issues Between DMARC and Indirect Email Flows) to Informational RFC
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- From: kathleen . moriarty . ietf
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dmarc-interoperability-15.txt> (Interoperability Issues Between DMARC and Indirect Email Flows) to Informational RFC
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dmarc-interoperability-15.txt> (Interoperability Issues Between DMARC and Indirect Email Flows) to Informational RFC
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: IESG meeting thoughts
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: IESG meeting thoughts
- Re: The ecosystem is moving
- Fw: just look at that
- Proposed modification of IPR notice inside each ID/RFC
- From: tglassey@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: Gen-ART IETF Last Call review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-12
- Gen-ART IETF Telechat review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-12
- Re: GenArt LC review: draft-ietf-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos-15
- Re: GenArt LC review: draft-ietf-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos-15
- Re: GenArt LC review: draft-ietf-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos-15
- Re: Gen-ART IETF Last Call review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-12
- Re: IESG meeting thoughts
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: IESG meeting thoughts
- Re: IESG meeting thoughts
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
- Re: IESG meeting thoughts
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: IESG meeting thoughts
- Re: IESG meeting thoughts
- Re: IESG meeting thoughts
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: IESG meeting thoughts
- Re: IESG meeting thoughts
- Re: IESG meeting thoughts
- Re: IESG meeting thoughts
- IESG meeting thoughts
- Re: The ecosystem is moving
- Re: The ecosystem is moving
- Re: The ecosystem is moving
- Re: The ecosystem is moving
- Re: The ecosystem is moving
- Re: The ecosystem is moving
- Re: The ecosystem is moving
- Re: The ecosystem is moving
- Re: The ecosystem is moving
- Re: The ecosystem is moving
- Re: The ecosystem is moving
- Re: The ecosystem is moving
- Re: The ecosystem is moving
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: The ecosystem is moving
- Re: The ecosystem is moving
- Re: The ecosystem is moving
- Re: The ecosystem is moving
- Re: The ecosystem is moving
- Re: The ecosystem is moving
- Re: The ecosystem is moving
- Re: The ecosystem is moving
- Re: The ecosystem is moving
- Re: The ecosystem is moving
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: The ecosystem is moving
- Re: Sad news: Prof.Suguru Yamaguchi passed on May 9th, 2016
- Re: [sidr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-rpsl-sig-10.txt> (Securing RPSL Objects with RPKI Signatures) to Proposed Standard
- Code Sprint in Berlin
- Gen-ART IETF Last Call review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-12
- Sad news: Prof.Suguru Yamaguchi passed on May 9th, 2016
- Re: The ecosystem is moving
- Re: [sidr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-rpsl-sig-10.txt> (Securing RPSL Objects with RPKI Signatures) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [sidr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-rpsl-sig-10.txt> (Securing RPSL Objects with RPKI Signatures) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [sidr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-rpsl-sig-10.txt> (Securing RPSL Objects with RPKI Signatures) to Proposed Standard
- 答复: The ecosystem is moving
- From: Hejianfei (Jeffrey)
- Re: [sidr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-rpsl-sig-10.txt> (Securing RPSL Objects with RPKI Signatures) to Proposed Standard
- The ecosystem is moving
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: xml2rfc.ietf.org down?
- Re: xml2rfc.ietf.org down?
- xml2rfc.ietf.org down?
- Topics in IETF leadership team retreats
- Re: IETF registration fees...
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-isis-node-admin-tag-10
- Re: IETF 96 - Registration and Hotel Reservations Now Open!
- From: Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
- Re: IETF registration fees...
- Re: IETF registration fees...
- Re: IETF registration fees...
- IETF registration fees...
- IETF 96 - Registration and Hotel Reservations Now Open!
- Update on Remote Mentoring: Internet Draft Review Teams
- IETF 96 To Open for Registration Soon
- From: IETF Administrative Director
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-tls-chacha20-poly1305-04 - resend
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-tls-chacha20-poly1305-04 - resend
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-use-case-06
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-v6ops-host-addr-availability-05
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-tls-chacha20-poly1305-04 - resend
- Re: Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-isis-node-admin-tag-10
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-v6ops-host-addr-availability-05
- Re: Gen-ART review ofdraft-ietf-rtcweb-alpn-03
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-rtcweb-alpn-03 (Was: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review ofdraft-ietf-rtcweb-alpn-03)
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-isis-node-admin-tag-10
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-v6ops-host-addr-availability-05
- IAB sent comments on ICANN draft bylaws
- CFP: ACM, IRTF & ISOC Applied Networking Research Workshop 2016
[Index of Archives]
[IETF Announcements]
[IETF]
[IP Storage]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCTP]
[Linux Newbies]
[Fedora Users]