Hi all, thanks! Having a new section is even better! This could be used to cover all transmissions performed by rtcweb (not only RTP-based media)! Mirja > Am 08.08.2016 um 00:22 schrieb Allison Mankin <allison.mankin@xxxxxxxxx>: > > All sounds good to me. Thank you, Harald and Colin. > > On Aug 7, 2016 17:30, "Harald Alvestrand" <harald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Den 04. aug. 2016 14:07, skrev Colin Perkins: > > Hi, > > >> What’s about the following? > >> > >> "For transport of media, secure RTP is used. The details of the profile of RTP used are described in "RTP Usage“ [I-D.ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage], which mandates the use of a circuit breaker [draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-circuit-breakers-17] and congestion control (see [draft-ietf-rmcat-cc-requirements-09] for further guidance).“ > > > > No objection, but it’s not my draft to make the change. > > > > This works for me. New section entitled "Congestion control". > It needs to also mention that SCTP is already congestion-controlled. > _______________________________________________ > Tsv-art mailing list > Tsv-art@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsv-art