Re: New Version Notification for draft-leiba-rfc2119-update-00.txt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>     >> XML format and screen readers.
>     >>
>     >> I have not looked deeply into the final RFC-format XML spec.
>     >> Does it already markup SHOULD/MUST/MAY in some useful way?
>     >> Could it?  If it does, should this document point out this?
>
>     > That's a good point, and I will look into what this might need to say
>     > with respect to the XML markup.
>
> Thank you!
> I think that markup on these keywords would help screen readers if they learn
> to use the XML instead.

I have checked, and I propose this change to the draft:

OLD

   === NEW ===
   In many standards track documents several words are used to signify
   the requirements in the specification.  These words are often
   capitalized, as shown below, but they do not have to be.  This
   document defines how these words are interpreted in IETF documents
   when the words are capitalized.

NEW

   === NEW ===
   In many standards track documents several words are used to signify
   the requirements in the specification.  These words are often
   capitalized, as shown below, but they do not have to be.  This
   document defines how these words are interpreted in IETF documents
   when the words are capitalized and/or marked as <bcp14> in the
   XML source (see [draft-iab-xml2rfc], Section 2.9).

END

The reference to draft-iab-xml2rfc would be informative.  Comments?

Barry




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]